IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC... query

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F8821E80FA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.341, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gc5SO6aSAjWx for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051B321F9FED for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id v2so1894976qcr.20 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PHpZMq9lz9PTztyT0CNAQgyaeRI0R4oYSib0fT5QWLc=; b=Uo+yUzQj6OrtU0F2sYtsTX3HeEw09FrrYT40laZIvjIZ4ETkqugGweuyy9tD/Vj4Ca VUXqCIpg4Sxx7Gq8c39huE2qprRJ3z2VhIbam4nd/Bc8YPW8R2f/tqVMOCyGBoesrwER NIVe8V+PisV1TW2AfdOni1+i/cFskX69LjsiBKw8wnw8PalTviWZdM/WZckpXr2aKah1 1BeJRvOI7cDelWZnJ9rymCKRGR/61t1vSKEE3cOzWj7yp879awGfXvd/ek6CCz1Sgf2e uFzc07yn4EYTIBgMZbLwPq/ACpzTOH/q+hIhIJKLVVzaBMAartQObJ3CU3U/JceLyuHO 9hGQ==
X-Received: by 10.49.127.116 with SMTP id nf20mr10374901qeb.90.1380302309375; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (dsl-173-206-79-23.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.79.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm20851769qao.3.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5245BDE1.4080307@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:18:25 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sajjad akbar <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com>
References: <1380272938.39375.YahooMailNeo@web121502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAD6AjGSTqJJt1QoJf=x0t3enuu5ydrD45-Mkrn9Jk0veFRYF1g@mail.gmail.com> <1380292322.5784.YahooMailNeo@web121504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1380292322.5784.YahooMailNeo@web121504.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC... query
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:18:33 -0000

You might look at
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-softwire-6rdmulticast/, 
taking note that it has not drawn any interest in the Softwires Working 
Group.

On 27/09/2013 10:32 AM, sajjad akbar wrote:
> Dear fellows
>
> Thanks for referring RFC 6555.   Actually we are doing a project tittled
>
> Design and Development of Hybrid IPv4 and IPv6 Network for QoS Enabled Video Streaming Multicast Application
>
>
>   in Pakistan (http://www.corenet.org.pk/projects.php). It is funded by a Telecom sector. The purpose is to build confidence of ISP's on IPv6. There is very limited implementation of V6 in Pakistan.
>
> We are implementing multicast pim-sm for v6 on this hybrid v4 and v6 network. To handle transition we have decided to use dual stack and tunneling mechanisms.
> Multicast for hybrid v4 and v6 network is only working with dual stack. No tunneling technique (6to4, 6RD) is supporting multicast.
>
> Can you people suggest a way to test multicast for these tunneling mechanisms?
>
> Regards
> Sajjad
> IPv4 project team lead
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: cb.list6 <cb.list6@gmail.com>
> To: sajjad akbar <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; v6ops-bounces@ietf.org
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC... query
>
>
>
> Inline
> On Sep 27, 2013 2:09 AM, "sajjad akbar" <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi...
>>
>> There is a following  issue regarding dual stack in context of DNS for IPv6.
>>
>> If a dual stack enable node try to connect a server which is also dual stack but having issue in his IPv6 stack temporary. In this case, DNS returned the AAAA address to the requesting node. What are the possibilities to identify this issues or how we can solve it?
>>
> Please see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6555
>> Regards
>> Sajjad
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email