Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC... query

"cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E90221F9CA4; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-SH9OHaoWs9; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAE621F9C60; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so2726928wes.13 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Qo0/rMC70IUzBo7MlmRXQ/usnZ08YWYDCd1sZBWWXbY=; b=nmt39KWzemMgiCx9856vWkuM7oFh2CAH7amth9IkjqR8AG34it2zN2A3naVOU7IARN 5bZ0UXTxMuxDJXxv5ZB8F0Bnw929LmlnPL/41eeDUta3uHhLLvSzgVLmxiJUR78X8gtG FORt4AaOeJDBBhptpZayqpkBzaMm/qAjTQUsBndI+w3jRO+x2h7tRrFYhV0FAziCk4Cf OMLEKp70wPhZx0KtcsUELL+xz2SzIMISjx8nOS1GFlNG4XvvKWILhmhVdSJK/BhjXtCj yTQ2mUuIFKGlGmTA+Oio6ZdXHomj/7S8jsHZMPJ0W1AfREy1/ArkyS6tFmOQQFNY1LD1 /lIQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.23.8 with SMTP id i8mr180199wjf.68.1380289485625; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.114.137 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.114.137 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1380272938.39375.YahooMailNeo@web121502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References: <1380272938.39375.YahooMailNeo@web121502.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:44:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGSTqJJt1QoJf=x0t3enuu5ydrD45-Mkrn9Jk0veFRYF1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: sajjad akbar <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b450a427a611504e75db00b"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, v6ops-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share WGLC... query
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:44:47 -0000

Inline

On Sep 27, 2013 2:09 AM, "sajjad akbar" <sajjad_akr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> hi...
>
> There is a following  issue regarding dual stack in context of DNS for
IPv6.
>
> If a dual stack enable node try to connect a server which is also dual
stack but having issue in his IPv6 stack temporary. In this case, DNS
returned the AAAA address to the requesting node. What are the
possibilities to identify this issues or how we can solve it?
>

Please see http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6555
> Regards
> Sajjad
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>