Re: [v6ops] management and ipv6

On 12/16/10 10:49 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> In the course of discussing draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines in
> the IESG, Dan and other IESG members brought up the need to talk about
> management in IPv6 networks. For instance, in IPv6-only networks all
> your management tools have to be capable of IPv6, both in dual stack and
> IPv6-only you want your data models to support IPv6, in dual stack you
> need to monitor reachability and errors not just in IPv4 but also in
> IPv6, and so on.

what version of netflow you use is also germain for example.

> They believe that there's quite a bit of work in this
> if you actually dig through all the details such as what MIB versions
> are required.
> 
> Draft-arkko will be moving forward as we close some other last issues,
> but would the V6OPS WG be willing to work on a separate document to talk
> about management of IPv6 networks? Or is there such a document already?

There's a corpus of work expressed as nanog presnetations among others
on how you manage ipv6 networks.

If some kind of gap analysis reveals protocol omissions or usability
issues with the management of ipv6 I could imagine  that fitting within
the v6ops scope.

> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 