[v6ops] draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark discussion

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 08 April 2018 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1836D120721 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFSPr3m3dMRb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x233.google.com (mail-pl0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F291200A0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e22-v6so1351505plj.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 22:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to; bh=7kIahQVYiBljEhPP1NUEdyrsw9o2wxSQMCFhSjKK+lU=; b=SUhBCbI9S0DgWQ0h8XsRcYIUuV99sjXF2sZ2ULybimzq/YACN21OdLw1IXaCFh9mCO cnjYbNL7te0qPRnBFrjDgwqZSy5aue6OwSzLXhp3JbYBS/hEej9lKoWdUBEOA/KJtATv aL4OZ8lMtLj8udKSSeRJo5SuGuo7ydn4bP9VM2HIod6haCeOqabK5QVWe8NyGVrtBPR4 AR2YYUNhagNou+xI0y/h4WROI+85JfY5BjBecdROkjytSZU/qJ1P/BVm91Y7kzRxWIzC j3V5zoNzFbaWqHceXf2MA4Zg8miSOPpfskJAFBPxeyEjixeda8mplws3f7PHYMY+p4t2 qX8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id:to; bh=7kIahQVYiBljEhPP1NUEdyrsw9o2wxSQMCFhSjKK+lU=; b=iWFa84tdn/J6AGbj4bwj+S5MyTw24TLechDrJSPlwHFR1ifLCSI6kJdTTtdZvsmSj2 UQhiknfDxAN3aSncyFugpbAqaUTeNX77qvsW9WHXNtszxJo2YjPXvIeA6JRuITGcmwJ7 eQDFB3/4d/L4LcZEgh8dNksyggRiE7Tkjp1i0ZkwAD8eAmweXb5UB+Fffkqu353FEPwZ VEwsOGqykgik7fUu4H6R5ySJ3M5wvWAW87e/4JzfBI/pmPkOXyTvSzCFtDlo0Oy3xMBP terrFPWs2WU/z9lma26fO9u+FFgHWyX9jf3KrL8dEKREfSHcNNbyiJMtse9bswHr0gnp 8+Ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FQDEp9ZEc1+0G8QP1zalKkdioXE0wJa9rRFgaqLlj9cV1XMhQg n4XcumupviStVeiR9wO8hA2W0tEt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+RLHiCdgIsjdZEtbdA1C630BzP6FdWi9G4oiyUlBjR7jCFkz6AdCBPdURt9YUCWp8whEPUKw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8646:: with SMTP id y6-v6mr34251617plt.182.1523163627848; Sat, 07 Apr 2018 22:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:1546::1161? ([2600:8802:5600:1546::1161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm25266380pfg.183.2018.04.07.22.00.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Apr 2018 22:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3009F390-4CE6-434E-8A7D-ABEDB8F38E49"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 22:00:21 -0700
Message-Id: <DBC01DDF-88B1-43BC-9487-A8AEDE60DF2D@gmail.com>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KePjBJDEi_6GRCJJbWJkI-ytmcQ>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark discussion
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 05:00:31 -0000

At IETF 101, Giuseppe Fioccola presented draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark. The draft is at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark, and his presentation deck is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-v6ops-ipv6-performance-measurement-with-alternate-marking-method-00.

There was also discussion in 6man regarding the encoding mechanism. I'll refer you to the 6man minutes for that discussion. But to that end, Roberta Maglione, Giuseppe Fioccola, Bob Hinden, Ole Troan, and I met for breakfast to discuss this draft. The issue has to do with the placement of bits and the service provided. The general consensus, as I understand it, was to recommend that the authors consider the Conex extension in

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7837
7837 IPv6 Destination Option for Congestion Exposure (ConEx). S.
     Krishnan, M. Kuehlewind, B. Briscoe, C. Ralli. May 2016. (Format:
     TXT=29708 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC7837)

and consider how to use unused fields in it in the Hop-by-hop Header. Ideally, that means including the HBH Header and the indicated option as transmitted by the source system, so that other systems en route can inspect and/or update it.

Giuseppe will use the existing draft as a vehicle for the present, but it may or may not be discussed in v6ops. Bob would like Giuseppe to remove the discussion of the several possible placements and only discuss this option. It would also be wise for Giuseppe to correspond with the authors of that RFC, in accordance with the definition of "experimental" in RFC 2026, to ensure that he and they don't somehow trip over each other.

I would like to invite v6ops discussion. This especially includes the question of whether it makes useful recommendations for your operational environment.

Related documents include:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fioccola-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark
  "Multipoint Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance
  monitoring", Giuseppe Fioccola, Mauro Cociglio, Amedeo Sapio, Riccardo
  Sisto, 2018-03-01

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fioccola-spring-flow-label-alt-mark
  "Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Performance Measurement with Alternate
  Marking Method in Segment Routing", Giuseppe Fioccola, Gunter Van de Velde,
  Mauro Cociglio, Praveen Muley, 2017-10-26,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fioccola-v6ops-ipv6-alt-mark
  "IPv6 Performance Measurement with Alternate Marking Method", Giuseppe
  Fioccola, Gunter Van de Velde, Mauro Cociglio, Praveen Muley, 2018-02-26,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fmm-nvo3-pm-alt-mark
  "Performance Measurement (PM) with Alternate Marking in Network
  Virtualization Overlays (NVO3)", Giuseppe Fioccola, Gregory Mirsky, Tal
  Mizrahi, 2018-03-02

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8321
8321 Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance
     Monitoring. G. Fioccola, Ed., A. Capello, M. Cociglio, L.
     Castaldelli, M. Chen, L. Zheng, G. Mirsky, T. Mizrahi. January 2018.
     (Format: TXT=84513 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL) (DOI:
     10.17487/RFC8321)