IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RTGWG last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-03

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 06 April 2018 03:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FC512E04D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFk1EpQAoojO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5190B124BAC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id i3so128450wmf.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 20:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aZtuIWM0xMDdekgHAEG7m/08RaT3PZNaIKwN8pmbZiM=; b=IKeO0rg9rWssXmcrUWgz4fkWjeR1J4lK5ZcO8g7NO6F7mASG9DTSpOHPzoHxJGizu7 vwHeCnr0TUmhq957cOMxobMo6C8lQfgIGhYzavolf7zaDo52wbNuqQAF87dcH8c1ZG3c ITFyfSUTgYLYxnHFpAzv6xxXeKKSlf6Wvd3iOmMvaou6KaDjtGQyBIRaPcebymsBv3/i YNo5AYk6Qeueh7I+oNDYfwbQwdcrORVirpiBALRnxMkD3X8vVjUzPQWmUPw5PkEenZ7s MT+8g/skTDpi+ZNjFQlV7bIANu6I5BXY9IZUschHmuIRzeXuyQyD7FfT2jBbsJRVjjFc H4Jw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aZtuIWM0xMDdekgHAEG7m/08RaT3PZNaIKwN8pmbZiM=; b=fS/mWQMO+7a3iNhFXi5rV6n9g3DVP+SUKd/cVKnUGF06sqnHWsV6UoCH6WpepxzriB ydO9mXp1/eZ9nFHf6CMHDn8P1epmJ9y1tnPfdvmRUeAAv9+PtfnsvvWIwlOsU7v47OgH 0Ydl8wLk4IkBwkrG7+p4WWsd6XvJ3ATIFqTNvDwY5ysDDwOpyZqCzAdcL2eI9Bi+Qceo dgkTPGvqc++23pO5mM/hw7LB3ON2IKdya2W97f7KpIEdgFZ94d9HA/wPN/KCGIvafBRS i3jlv4Jzb40MNvt4Pnkm4UGyopXmle8FwHvINJODefWS1WrNmGy0E8ZT+HT4OqXV2Iin DdTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EnSNCiVoyr0XqWk1E40QOwpSH8OriHyy7+gLpVIm1vvT7ejowz Xc6Hf4nN4aG5uA26I0uYPwzBNyHB18a+ncP+6qBtGQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+7Ua5jCSKaU1Z4k93s5IMmPPDVE9XaA9XNmGl++TZqmqq65RSVs80e4yTv4xL5welPChIojwnI6uc174novaE=
X-Received: by 10.28.85.200 with SMTP id j191mr13425237wmb.127.1522985660564; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 20:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.142.212 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f635dac8-2e5b-f376-33cb-2354f0576125@gmail.com>
References: <CA48FC37-238A-4D87-B2FA-75C763370B6C@gmail.com> <794587A2-46DF-4F2F-86B5-56083D0864A5@gmail.com> <9a3234af-cc1a-1054-b6d1-3baa7ad7ca81@gmail.com> <CAFU7BATKsWS08hL2HeDsCq9YPdnPad1QXPqvEhcqHVba_h63_g@mail.gmail.com> <f635dac8-2e5b-f376-33cb-2354f0576125@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 12:33:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3WH3W1d4r239ocoLReFYS00vrs9-8naX8-kOW-7WQN=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141f0464c40f0056925bb50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/XxfTWv7AVw07Vy-QuuYPV3qNHEQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RTGWG last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-03
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 03:34:25 -0000

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> Much better, IMHO, to simply ignore NPTv6 in this draft, and
> >> stick to your own knitting.
> >
> > So do you think the whole section 5 shall be removed? (the deployment
> > challenges could be discussed in the separate section)
>
> Personally, yes. You know the strength of feelings in the IETF on this
> issue, which is why NPTv6 is Experimental anyway. So why start a flame
> war when it's a side-issue for your draft anyway?
>

Indeed. If you mention NPTv6 at all, I would just say it's not a solution
because it breaks end-to-end connectivity.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email