IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-04

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 22 November 2012 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5F521F8468 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:47:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbhX6fwygVnd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D7121F8B40 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAMGlY31020505; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:47:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1353602863; bh=tOnguiMHPqhTTAXgh/feTUaKX8YVzR924m/Y1Q8PYQM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=1bGnQwyiQbYFBppsLKNCTViLfMUe8xCS+3wTMKKJkSMRs8e3coeFG2+TDPtQZhalm pu8koLYK3ohed6hKdf2CKJlyjVf6voAsA8ZZ8KATPo7xgxOQFsbHfQaAFyOBcxULc7 u1AsYqRfjLAkK2AhV3VHEj+saBS2TwaDa32ZFzzA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1353602863; i=@resistor.net; bh=tOnguiMHPqhTTAXgh/feTUaKX8YVzR924m/Y1Q8PYQM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dpYZdNnjXm68bgbjnGo646G6LjhtCvBVslgNW8zn8eDYs+ChTuwsD2k98oqQm7han qkEnhye2xlVH6Qhu/oZEjP68MvXZN6JLa6jgKD7xr7pSLTvoKnDeGn6cLF20Ujmfu6 cM4ZcOUoxLjN8yoBm8qbe4l402Sq21yycc9uylCY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121122081017.0a5d5528@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:44:13 -0800
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <50AE2D7F.2060401@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20121122003329.0b7cb9a8@elandnews.com> <50AE2D7F.2060401@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:47:52 -0000

Hi Brian,
At 05:49 22-11-2012, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Fair comment, but what a wasted opportunity if the LA and African regions
>continue to install legacy-only IP.

Yes, and it would put these regions further back.

>Aren't content and cookies special cases of applications? It's all
>layer 7 fluff as far as layer 3 is concerned :-).

Well, the fluff has to be somewhere. :-)  The short answer to your 
question is yes.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email