Re: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentation

on slide 66 it shows smartphones each assigned a /64.

This is not the right thing to do, unless one agrees SLAAC should work 
with a /65 as well, for a CPE for example.

One should make one's mind either one of those:
- /64 per smartphone and /65 possible in SLAAC.
- /64 in SLAAC and /63 per smartphone.

Alex

Le 17/09/2019 à 11:17, Mark Smith a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I've noticed on a number of occasions now over a number of years that
> some people are treating the ULA address space as though it is an
> exact duplicate of RFC 1918, and not including a unique Global ID -
> typically using all zeros for that part.
> 
> So I recently prepared and presented at the AusNOG conference on
> "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing" right. My goal wasn't just to
> present there, but to also have a slide deck available that describes
> exactly why we went away from Site-Locals and why globally unique ULA
> prefixes are required.
> 
> Feel free to share as widely as possible!
> 
> On Slideshare:
> 
> https://www.slideshare.net/MarkSmith214/ausnog-2019-getting-ipv6-private-addressing-right
> 
> PDF:
> 
> http://www.users.on.net/~markachy/AusNOG%202019%20-%20Getting%20IPv6%20Private%20Addressing%20Right.pdf
> 
> Regards,
> Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 