IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Operational Headache: Upstream liveness

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Fri, 29 March 2019 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rajiva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5C01201AA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=URDe32WV; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=c0aOtJkj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pSymVTtWB-81 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33AC012015D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1328; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1553839762; x=1555049362; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=j8EqNhOjDPg2zxfh+3TfIy+MHD9iPqcg5QpOQB0i+7s=; b=URDe32WVfLX6aPvD542UDVmjgAbT7LFzdiwSpOTQyi4Hb3BKhvAw+DYj fOmIV/rGLv7n8yNMyeOVYlrhU6EcebdNHZ4oSn1ArPMdNOz8I+PushBjo 4qKry+lFRRb6FejNpvjdpXHmwMqZ4xiRu/hZQeRWO5njhq+6HdGtua5j7 M=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:w30KoRFoxLmImTgfI40vJJ1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4w3Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNVcejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+eeTjbS0kFexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APAADMtZ1c/4ENJK1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVAEBAQEBAQsBgT1QA2h0BAsnh1UDjzGCV4k4jVaCUgNUDQEBGA0HhEAChTQiNwYNAQEDAQEJAQIBAm0cDIVKAQEBAwEBATgGAQEsCwEECwIBCBgeECEGCyUCBA4FHoMEAYFdAw0IAQIMni4CihSCIIJ4AQEFgTEBAwQMQUGCQQ0LggwDBYEvAYsxF4FAP4E4H4JMPoIaRwEBAwGBXYM7giaKR5oxNgkCh2qIHIM/GpQMkTWBPIt1AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFjIoFWcBU7KgGCQYIKg26FFIU/coEojk0BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,283,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="540731255"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 29 Mar 2019 06:09:20 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2T69Ku6014424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:09:20 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:09:19 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:09:19 -0500
Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:09:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2K1V83GhEC2XTKAQVfEdx51zhp9lgrXKn63VYHiw0co=; b=c0aOtJkjtGLdPpA6ocl+egRFJQAPu7V2KfFccW9aJlf4PPwxMSlThEtJhteur1WBF1cl/dYj2qCnG53CTu25c6vp8gauzRKPAsOcfM1BzAiTRDCtET6XyWNXqof2i+ZLFjJzGW4JZl6MrhGkrHqryN2bcNCyEsgespMpwRFj/iA=
Received: from DM6PR11MB3068.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.218.153) by DM6PR11MB2651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.176.99.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1750.16; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:09:18 +0000
Received: from DM6PR11MB3068.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d16:a8db:b524:e147]) by DM6PR11MB3068.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d16:a8db:b524:e147%4]) with mapi id 15.20.1750.014; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:09:18 +0000
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Operational Headache: Upstream liveness
Thread-Index: AQHU5fJv4iCa3cLT7k+h6fJIuixptaYiH/1g
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:09:17 +0000
Message-ID: <86DE9F4C-CF1F-4D23-BAA8-3051459BCC86@cisco.com>
References: <C08F6471-3035-495C-B8AF-EE9FE516793F@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C08F6471-3035-495C-B8AF-EE9FE516793F@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rajiva@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2600:387:2:809::44]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d2521b94-03f3-4f8c-e371-08d6b40d13e4
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600127)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM6PR11MB2651;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6PR11MB2651:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM6PR11MB26518614FCA92171C049A3A5C75A0@DM6PR11MB2651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0991CAB7B3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(189003)(199004)(66574012)(14454004)(229853002)(105586002)(33656002)(6436002)(966005)(53936002)(6486002)(446003)(4326008)(476003)(6916009)(2906002)(478600001)(71200400001)(6246003)(46003)(83716004)(97736004)(36756003)(6116002)(486006)(2616005)(71190400001)(11346002)(106356001)(25786009)(256004)(102836004)(6506007)(8936002)(99286004)(53546011)(76176011)(7736002)(305945005)(186003)(6512007)(6306002)(5660300002)(8676002)(82746002)(81156014)(86362001)(68736007)(316002)(81166006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM6PR11MB2651; H:DM6PR11MB3068.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wPQ2KPqGaZSf5FHjUekX0Ce23qFFXW+O4BW5eKb1hZ+ixfrsr9dC3PxnGQAzh9e9+JciIv6xOfeADjbHqQs6Yu0bPHUrbDTfDGqemjPAUhqpJRWygSD2PUKFyVoPG1a7tq1ZqtmoX/AlNIVO0kRJM8n9N3g/p0uN9t8B+J6XXZW0AXSNKaQqcek5DJuMb65J/wOXyWl7klzChCYUfb5fxLYM/CC9qUU4Yxa/1CXRf6JeYwbpN+lGjfO55yTFI80eF5q/ic/m4SgHm3klnj87/ohwbchlO1DWrCGG0pJ1eaeF0vDNtjTIdV6QjyHesJ/fgCLkV3b1MMyuzlZIqlUCNljixo4d9j09PUhlgWw53fnIIclGWpoPv4kSPCCjVncDc8k6I/RTwd+yJfwn4lnqTAWwVgdcFFmw3Ju58aT9Me8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d2521b94-03f3-4f8c-e371-08d6b40d13e4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Mar 2019 06:09:17.9454 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR11MB2651
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LXx6pbVkteK0PlI9_lbWksW59SE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Operational Headache: Upstream liveness
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 06:09:25 -0000

Why is NUD not sufficient to address the problem (WAN neighbor unreachable)? 

I hope that the HGW devices are  compliant with RFC4861 / 7048. 

Cheers,
Rajiv  

> On Mar 29, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-104-v6ops-deutsche-telekom-terastream/, slide 9
> 
> What do we want to say on this issue? Mikael mentions draft-patterson-intarea-ipoe-health as possibly relevant, but I also get the idea that there is more to say; in this case, I think I need to send a note to the relevant authors and chairs asking them what the prognosis is and expressing operational interest. First, is there a consensus to do that? Second, do we have additional comments to pass along? Our comments might be adequately summarized by forwarding a link to this thread, or might rise to the level that needs to be discussed in an internet draft in v6ops. Comments?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
> Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
>     Sun Tzu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email