Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems WGLC

Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Thu, 12 January 2012 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DDA21F85A4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:00:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQAgNVrl-2py for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (RayH-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910F621F8594 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5A88700E3; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:00:31 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1v0crNUjbcom; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:00:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [192.168.0.3]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F14FC87005C; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:00:21 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F0EBD45.3070003@globis.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:00:21 +0100
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox Express 1.0.1 (Macintosh/20100705)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <2AD7A9CB-A67C-41CD-8F9F-664EBBE4E880@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2AD7A9CB-A67C-41CD-8F9F-664EBBE4E880@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:00:35 -0000

I have reviewed this document in detail, and forwarded a number of nits 
direct to the authors.

I believe that the document contains important operational information 
and advice to the v6ops community.

regards,
RayH

Fred Baker wrote:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems. Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
>
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.
>