IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems WGLC

Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 12 January 2012 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDD221F8597 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.074
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.074 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.375, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ypL2TN4vNWIz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7504521F84E0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (host-64-47-136-190.masergy.com [64.47.136.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0CGodp3030522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:39 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4F0F0F5A.10805@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:50:34 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <2AD7A9CB-A67C-41CD-8F9F-664EBBE4E880@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2AD7A9CB-A67C-41CD-8F9F-664EBBE4E880@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:50:44 -0000

On 1/8/12 22:32 , Fred Baker wrote:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems. Please read it now. If you find nits (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed, please post your comments to the list.
> 
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the document as well as its content. If you have read the document and believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important comment to make.

The version 01 contains the last major change, to reflect concerns brian
raised at wg acceptance. version 02 is largely just corrections.

The diff2 from 00 to 01 is here:

http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems-01.txt

 _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email