Re: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Mon, 24 May 2021 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED2D3A2167 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 02:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xAqH-kar6HjW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 May 2021 02:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4409F3A215F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 May 2021 02:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FpX315bxDz6P36D; Mon, 24 May 2021 17:29:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 24 May 2021 11:40:57 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Mon, 24 May 2021 11:40:57 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111
Thread-Index: AQHXTUlyzw6sF2nEN0qS5x0f/E39eartBVcAgAVdQIA=
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 09:40:57 +0000
Message-ID: <7bf1aa7d24144c1d95b5368f0eca39cf@huawei.com>
References: <162149555130.11217.7956464607647225045@ietfa.amsl.com> <57A641E2-030E-45E0-A06E-D4D4E3DC4BD9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <57A641E2-030E-45E0-A06E-D4D4E3DC4BD9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.217.140]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7bf1aa7d24144c1d95b5368f0eca39cfhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NZErSvgSF9-CLw3Lm4JbHpfR_Pc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 09:41:06 -0000

Dear Fred, All,
Regarding draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment, we are thoroughly reviewing it to address the high number of comments. Meanwhile we also received additional inputs offline, in particular from Jordi Palet and he will also join as new coauthor.
We have almost finished and I think we can publish the new version soon.

Regards,

Giuseppe

From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:29 AM
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111

Following up on the document list. See attached. This data is data tracker data that is reorganized into a format that I find more useful - each document has several statuses (has it been posted? What does the Working Group, IESG, or RFC Editor think of it?), and I try to sort that out into a "most relevant" status". Also, since "has it been updated since the most recent IETF meeting" is a factor in v6ops, you'll find that considered.

At this point, I have four questions for the working group:
   For draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison, any comments on progress/status? (The authors would like to wait until October 30 before making a decision, pending other tests)
   For draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment, any comments on progress/status? (On April 7, Guiseppe sent a note to the list asking for more comments)
   For draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc, What is the working group;'s opinion? The chairs think it is in a state conducive to adoption.
   For draft-vasilenko-v6ops-ipv6-oversized-analysis, where do we go? At this moment, I'm thinking it could be presented at discussed at IETF 111.

Per https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/important-dates/, we are on the clock for IETF 111. Register...


> On May 20, 2021, at 12:25 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org<mailto:session-request@ietf.org>> wrote:
>
>
>
> An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations
> Area Name: Operations and Management Area
> Session Requester: Fred Baker
>
>
> Number of Sessions: 1
> Length of Session(s):  1 Hour
> Number of Attendees: 100
> Conflicts to Avoid:
> Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr bess tsvwg
>
> Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg panrg grow
>
>
>
>
>
> People who must be present:
>  Fred Baker
>  Ron Bonica
>  Warren &quot;Ace&quot; Kumari
>
> Resources Requested:
>
> Special Requests:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------