Re: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 21 May 2021 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DC93A0B62 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXknGzdC9KMf for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A86B33A0B5F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id b7so5949482plg.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=v/n5EPAj8j8IuV363g09A+BmSStEKmUZS4GLIVLbb2k=; b=fLCouVR9K9f5KqDR6Y5BAtDyVGDFxp33yfw8sshk1FOhddt+LK3yBsff/MdFotrHbR lDjGDjwRz5o+zD1k1zVK7KEQifxUq7qDnP/pp+EOZGZkKXb/xa1yXk383nmnOVC5TvzV z/cY3cXfPtwQ/CNv7LvXFnMBEKzvCD6D/GnWHBBe3GkAPC1PdmZ2HI8UGqgBc8+L74sO g9S7CcrEK6qFY2TIrSz5k1n2AWSRRQRKYZpDK2Tz15izZv4/UPXJwS3FLZOBYuJ+na15 ZML45xqDXzdb6zjzJUg6GZlWnmf8AV7uky3jhOaq8P/a5vVhtqZwHcvK9rcLFP0vlUU5 FgmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=v/n5EPAj8j8IuV363g09A+BmSStEKmUZS4GLIVLbb2k=; b=YWC7FFC0hAR6Jhj1COP3JcsoZTc6U5d80o2K7onGFqapTrw9Tg7u+e88eRJQOIx6lt 0HMbXvoBg2bbbpJqlmkgsEwjss/QNsbBqjdjk42o65zNsEd1G24BOMhxZBuVTXKnGU6K 7ziZC+YqEP5YJjRE5CBJtcVm3ycfr/jmn6m8N7gpGc52Dw4+upME2kgZ959JAoS3N3Ys FpckJkp0ezfu3wyrILOrAnmClLTH0qri5NFTdj7uru9uD5wijhE1yh/tDVnWGI2kSXLi ap2dh3pCX2brTIO9TbW27m3X1I8j9HFBSu3HOFgNtEJI6Zf9iAprfrjo5O15cdw1x9Kr jHAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oOs7kl+Wh55K8Lb1+jqgmMBfIQwqfyuKOtNgloXFvpN167pil AoPnbuYzkIT1ES69YtFw5g0pwm7iIWs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxFWVtrnt7/VlMhqt10VKgWdK75RRY0ik2W6mKtueI8y2PfXkNGKgLQ10JGRoiaV6exM33Yg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7444:b029:ef:80f4:67e4 with SMTP id e4-20020a1709027444b02900ef80f467e4mr9201380plt.66.1621560562315; Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:8802:5b00:bc1::1014]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g72sm2824007pfb.33.2021.05.20.18.29.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <57A641E2-030E-45E0-A06E-D4D4E3DC4BD9@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0196B410-BB8F-4500-8A36-0F996BF28683"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:29:20 -0700
In-Reply-To: <162149555130.11217.7956464607647225045@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <162149555130.11217.7956464607647225045@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/UfLdzP94UOsxh8rokYprQH_zxRI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 01:29:28 -0000

Following up on the document list. See attached. This data is data tracker data that is reorganized into a format that I find more useful - each document has several statuses (has it been posted? What does the Working Group, IESG, or RFC Editor think of it?), and I try to sort that out into a "most relevant" status". Also, since "has it been updated since the most recent IETF meeting" is a factor in v6ops, you'll find that considered.

At this point, I have four questions for the working group:
   For draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison, any comments on progress/status? (The authors would like to wait until October 30 before making a decision, pending other tests)
   For draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment, any comments on progress/status? (On April 7, Guiseppe sent a note to the list asking for more comments)
   For draft-horley-v6ops-expand-doc, What is the working group;'s opinion? The chairs think it is in a state conducive to adoption.
   For draft-vasilenko-v6ops-ipv6-oversized-analysis, where do we go? At this moment, I'm thinking it could be presented at discussed at IETF 111.

Per https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/important-dates/, we are on the clock for IETF 111. Register...


> On May 20, 2021, at 12:25 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <session-request@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations
> Area Name: Operations and Management Area
> Session Requester: Fred Baker
> 
> 
> Number of Sessions: 1
> Length of Session(s):  1 Hour
> Number of Attendees: 100
> Conflicts to Avoid:
> Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr bess tsvwg
> 
> Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg panrg grow
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> People who must be present:
>  Fred Baker
>  Ron Bonica
>  Warren &quot;Ace&quot; Kumari
> 
> Resources Requested:
> 
> Special Requests:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------