Re: [v6ops] LAN-side NTP in rfc7084bis?

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB9DC1519BA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3zd6_rHClp2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10CFC15792A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5cedfc32250so4503100a12.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; t=1710896849; x=1711501649; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vxRhp4Z11mckIV8wLeoiEkGNp6eBrDcEcFOfhj6TKzE=; b=XbantP1ycYWQDkIG+ElLCBcHRpAtPMwtq1Mn5mfKADPmOD0+eymXs9tfY6L3YOv1uW F2E4M6VUxKnCsmHZXLRpCh2DJqAA9OKPM7lE2B6pa8iS6AF9L3uTtCnWMB3QXG2LA9dc T9GWPhisiYi0yx0Yrp5Ux44JZlyTIZS9EUYeA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710896849; x=1711501649; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vxRhp4Z11mckIV8wLeoiEkGNp6eBrDcEcFOfhj6TKzE=; b=ODeu28GzrEaSsHwr8lNWIx9F67Ab9XPLArVu/pnz6BgOXSFANm8ZpL1LlQjTVii8Uh CiPAKp4NZgk6JOD/mBtbSi4CvTQekr99W+LAvnlEXoYAXX8mipJC9zUBrtEw2GYTmgeY NH7mUvmzQywVYZ0KUT5jU/6p/gyvfUFFCClmprl97h+4bxjcRh+9NfEBsJHUmXNnVHxB v0rPmgfLTR/a15sWqqTKhIjSQwYvS2wh7GGd+Jjt9WABHUF4WlCpFDu4yNv5r3MWajn3 1UPO3HhmRNN2iRjCPjraF6mtcpdtsSiy0Xxq2U7qaYSvRfCDvZN4Muymx7jcH6OkmYby jTXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwZY4nNtIdzRCXfFMrjp+K1hD/G1SfjFwjMFLC7Bask2QXhimqz QAMeK5t7OAyq79NDs3uHfuzeDQDFl5isxWiM5U62tj63OLpUKrPygIezkREQ1Nha5wrMmT/T9x9 zr+oUK7bSvV2f15TWHzD7f2O29Hj1VmPT/ululg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFThbkDGb2l63Alfgl8sN3/xvjs+qGmRL7p0hQENT0wx14CGNGZcpPPZ89fwOtnkwQmvDfFjVzLuenKkp5gfIg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:903:b0:29d:e193:e46d with SMTP id bo3-20020a17090b090300b0029de193e46dmr11651153pjb.39.1710896848800; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7199173b-a473-4117-63b3-917687cb5766@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7199173b-a473-4117-63b3-917687cb5766@gmail.com>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:07:17 +1000
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKu7hsRvgAaU_im8PJVOLqFcC89YZGVFRU8gxTtNFnwc8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ebad5106140d36fb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/OfOiO0OZIfPqe_JP7SHA81R6b2s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] LAN-side NTP in rfc7084bis?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:07:33 -0000

Hi Brian,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:49 AM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> It occurred to me a bit late that a reasonable statement might be that
> *if* a CE router supports NTP over IPv4 on the LAN side, then it MUST also
> support it over IPv6; otherwise it can be a MAY.
>
That is a very good "late" thought.   The next revision, we'll take a stab
at documenting that.

~Tim

>
> The rationale is to remove a possible IPv4 dependency for hosts.
>
> Regards
>     Brian Carpenter


> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>