IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 09:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921503A0DFF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:20:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urt3TbCoFMcV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 727273A0DFE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id t13so10793942ilp.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:20:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3f60cSin3NXwzWwARSkBoXPtpTGoxJkzKCjqc3ytbbk=; b=aYS3HurnEF/Yk8dtNYDX0Rc74EG1LUGhfrenRulqKlApMD+5qWiED1Phy2JXbqI+1B EbFfKaN7Zq859kHbdKClC9hPL0liqVi+3212JN6Vr77UHWZFKhyYkV/th9aC5lSWMriC gkK9iqXa+XjW4jlAsUwBBziTa4DJpB3nl2UiefpXaTV7kSc/eW4FGEmF0RzrOONNXnmY Pbr/RrKamqGbRyEt3WFfi5M0fKsR2Y7xDCWuKliqJ4epEwdi2vzgLSVXErk2/eHPBkUP oP6NaS8+hbFjYukd8gHf+eBcyAqPSh+gCm13OufBNLSrLZaBlrbuTQzz1kp4LN3K0xC1 Emhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3f60cSin3NXwzWwARSkBoXPtpTGoxJkzKCjqc3ytbbk=; b=ibkdiHqj5/w95xxXLI5h1wMGaHsGEO4mCTxdQFIaml5LYTUBrddeQrFQTOCfY8IE8D eQSdL8UFjllDt4xmT+DM+8mJfy1JmeoW3dYLwu7BKHtRQv89mQ71YRv0KUsPH7yT65SO fzuoh9zoy6iwTQcSrY80kr9jCtg1cESuTrA97V9CH/pdZP16TdnDyoZLubaT+/kkE2Nz tbtzl/uYZGuI7eXT/A7zr6mzzSKJ4cTs2yT8iBHYGmw9bjQNc/kxVYhy1lsKeLi5P9Ih od80gZpdursEYFwzVJVvXIIesVoLA0PluITuK7+AH1SdSMgPAgnK13v+Pe/+IKsf6fiU mH8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RjVNKYNJ+ejjlhTshWS4TWwJJY3i1Ady86ETidXViWP7LAxBr pG4Hxn+d0Fy5YyeGOfVhqzCkOhjgHZig/Zoumc6PhA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyMALlGUaxzuBhx12N7AyOEFwU/lfSLyJRx7ctLpmt+HQFPpz4d7yHHy6vLJjaA08Yvg0u3A5pl1J6KzoRS/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:690f:: with SMTP id e15mr13608389ilc.269.1604481631562; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:20:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160409793214.22613.15041785352190993395@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJhXr98mPsopQrUiKfXGuN+wxSEtNiP00LBEGrYObz62FHSa_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1LTcVKobDpiEjnxqKbX9drz1od+RNg7EdX_WO04JQgUw@mail.gmail.com> <49DFF195-CB76-4575-BA29-F134F99D6EE1@gmail.com> <CABNhwV27Dp6g+d-MGeGTR2eg7JJoRunzh2ALPr59z4u4JN4S7g@mail.gmail.com> <d8659634-734b-d5d4-a112-1f9dfaef72cb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d8659634-734b-d5d4-a112-1f9dfaef72cb@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:20:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3Ec2OCjfg98N_qJm=rYP9pj4HjpCmL3x_po8NNBc+1ZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro.shytyi@sfr.com>, Naveen Kottapalli <nkottapalli@benu.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>, Gyan Mishra <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b32ea305b3447d91"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/RIxYYtXGkUlV9ojmWLhSxn4Ijng>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:20:34 -0000

On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:09 AM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> So let's have a discussion whether there is a new operational problem here
> first:
>
>   "The main problem is that SLAAC RA or PD allocates a /64 by the
>    wireless carrier 4G, 5G, 3GPP to mobile handset or hotspot, however
>    segmentation of the /64 via SLAAC is required so that downstream
>    interfaces can be further sub-netted."
>
> Why isn't that in v6ops scope?


I'd say that is not in scope anywhere because there already exists a
protocol that solves this problem. It's called DHCPv6 PD.

If there is an operational problem with DHCPv6 PD, then that might indeed
be in scope for v6ops. That's not what the draft is about though. As far as
I can see it doesn't mention DHCPv6 PD at all. The draft is about proposing
a change to SLAAC, and as such is a protocol change that is not in scope
for v6ops.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email