Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 03:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5851A1ACA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:12:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKgLUxZqV8GW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22e.google.com (mail-qa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987721A1BA9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id j7so36889154qaq.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:12:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=282AUBfGwOhOIKguRyHtiNcl8TQ3KYgG9KT3olq0Kgs=; b=dA4GbGtvgYLsLaiKGo43MbjZ/u+K6feN8BVCkFd2IzR7rTsBI34Q4KV9PB3i+KUq5Q WvWIGsT6HJWx1KUN/tW/Mm3d/SmzPXKX2SCH7UgzA4i1D5vmYHDD5b11MkEdlai0xfAI ovgOeyOX8xZT9BZK8zWGduXtR1MLoitMBYr2+7i6Q8cM2FX5ypQFCQ3JR+/ZqWXawdWK FLGopRxLJU41wqJwgQ5i2UD8zBYqDQ8SqsuEZ0Hvpk+uiKo5JwYQnFCRgGMJZFPpxD35 iudDlqpOO679XbWfqx6oKHX9V9QL7a1D1ra9syKSBpm2g2+QczVqeLLehh7pu5M0v+FR 7D+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=282AUBfGwOhOIKguRyHtiNcl8TQ3KYgG9KT3olq0Kgs=; b=CzlVNiUYtHdC4EsYasQLOPghdJlppBbvltIKmsqRyXtRhAK2ic52W7RrS28gjeXPjr DIiawmtk7F2zgxcBawwnxjVg7YaAESVXl786Bmxw+BtrjdARV0Pja8oKs65GMvL8oXZ/ 8ZgdxmWX5o3BnoUCeGdVoXTC14FuTifeK1YVfAfkf0CXCcwx4OE5wP1hYF+6JKfdSCnQ ya4+/VTXHY9YVRKfgIzNaw/AQQBqeMI+5I6i6Q+aih8ACVvSHkmCfIOUhU79rOzuAIOP yYeJhYWawduw4MRqGOYhAPY8biuxNiD5tCre4LBYtaONBn2U72Uk0LPBsV6Ue6zRWsWz 7dfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlmHHeAN8sL7IimZC0FaQR3qAd/EncPjSBgEE3qgbBQ8BNkPG6HQFU8mHxuHVEYn14MbBsR
X-Received: by 10.224.136.130 with SMTP id r2mr60808220qat.18.1423019543736; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 19:12:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.230.10 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:12:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <39A489D3-C0EB-49DC-90E6-3279A23EC60E@cisco.com>
References: <39A489D3-C0EB-49DC-90E6-3279A23EC60E@cisco.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:12:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqp1bXftJUkRX76=tmPT0ypqWP28QD-88N1iSNGzEbsMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/T493jU3gzOvmwGWDdlqHczsarKU>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:12:25 -0000
> WGLC; on its way to IESG: > Feb 1 draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile Are you implying that this would be on the agenda for discussion in Dallas, or is it past that point now and its being past discussion is what would appear on a slide? :) > Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF: > > Aug 24 draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem I've seen this draft be usefully referred to a couple of times in the last few months. +1 to keeping it afloat, if not moving forward for some reason (cc'ing Joel explicitly).
- [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up Fred Baker (fred)