IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4F01A1BE6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:48:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jI59lX_dp1YZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854F61A1BDD for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 19:48:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1936; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1423021685; x=1424231285; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZfI0SnSnE8vxMMDcxT+gkEaaZ2lsVxKYriqjiVPpRJk=; b=jnzTzloFyWb88Ka4haVLlQ93oMbllNkQXxNYtkl8Ecm3a4NdehIt+NNZ mx+amOBotgOSP0bCvCfHT2+vkcLuB3YZ4ClWlspajDAtBAYpUR77xFxKc Uph8OWOCmlFvoVOox2534KI6wJLpn/Ee/7RUqxwFXaYCMzYNDtkGOqnnK g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsFAI2V0VStJV2R/2dsb2JhbABagwaBKwSCfbR6kwQCgRdDAQEBAQF9hAwBAQEDASNWBQsCAQgOCioCAjIlAgQOBQ6IFwi/ZJZYAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF494B4JoLoETBYRKBoo8gVSBK4Ynkl8ig25vgUR+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,516,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="393239390"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2015 03:48:04 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t143m3hI010663 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:48:03 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.211]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 21:48:03 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up
Thread-Index: AQHQQC1g63JX6izw00mQIN8RMgIU3g==
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:48:03 +0000
Message-ID: <441D3CE6-16C4-4CD2-9EB8-B63B2AA040A7@cisco.com>
References: <39A489D3-C0EB-49DC-90E6-3279A23EC60E@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqp1bXftJUkRX76=tmPT0ypqWP28QD-88N1iSNGzEbsMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxqp1bXftJUkRX76=tmPT0ypqWP28QD-88N1iSNGzEbsMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70B15157-F8F6-4E4A-AD60-95F4C612E6B9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hwX5-9jWAm4mDHHdBc_DtwqYz9A>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 92 heads Up
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:48:07 -0000

> On Feb 3, 2015, at 7:12 PM, Erik Kline <ek@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> WGLC; on its way to IESG:
>>    Feb  1  draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
> 
> Are you implying that this would be on the agenda for discussion in
> Dallas, or is it past that point now and its being past discussion is
> what would appear on a slide?  :)

If we’re still talking about it, we should finalize it there. We do need to decide what its status is.

>> Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF:
>> 
>>    Aug 24  draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
> 
> I've seen this draft be usefully referred to a couple of times in the
> last few months.  +1 to keeping it afloat, if not moving forward for
> some reason (cc'ing Joel explicitly).

Up to Joel. If folks tell us it should be a working group draft, it can be resubmitted as draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem, following the naming guideline that IETF tools depend on. Or whatever.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email