IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-01.txt

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Thu, 03 June 2021 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1788d66581=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24273A2C7C; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LU45u5T0Wn3g; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F4B3A2C7A; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1622702219; x=1623307019; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References: In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=4aGKzoL02UzWc2KTAkTN6lS7ymaW+f6nPUBk6ppgykI=; b=IchRualx0pq1J ADYxn/7r/39vgJZxXG9xo6IBxy2Z2byLBp8q5hd0lDwbb3DzYKLWxMqzpqS5fsP+ PEu8hgNMt8JvlUDKzWqAw1B/PMVA1LgA132ztQbVo5yAFIHLn2BaCS9xkVhRmPiV PG+sKEfV2DEanSNyLACqQ/e5vg4iI4=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:59 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:59 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000606361.msg; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:58 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:2dd5:d0fb:1ac1:c68d
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:58 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1788d66581=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.49.21050901
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:36:57 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2AB5F9C5-FF0A-47E7-8472-F529CE24C008@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-01.txt
References: <162254159656.7448.7482055154071850824@ietfa.amsl.com> <9da707a66e10475bb98abae5e3f7cb3f@huawei.com> <01D305D0-276E-4D66-9AC3-ED038C5AD11E@gmail.com> <4D1355CF-D62C-4BAB-8DC8-8FB2822CF854@consulintel.es> <9B3C50B8-D404-4556-8ED0-04037EE491AB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B3C50B8-D404-4556-8ED0-04037EE491AB@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/TKdOLze1uTCtFaKoK2zRWRxn9GU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:37:08 -0000

Hi Fred,

Not discussing your point, definitively there was some confusion or misunderstanding.

I was not co-author at that time, so I don't know if there were private conversations among the chairs and the authors, as it was the case for the other draft (which I'm co-authoring and we have then uploaded a new version as WG item: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison/).

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 3/6/21 8:24, "Fred Baker" <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> escribió:



    > On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:07 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
    > 
    > You asked (around March if I recall correctly) on the adoption of this draft and another one and for some reason authors understood that the signal was "go" for both documents.

    Well, in my defense, a *question* is not an *answer*. "Should we say 'go'?" is different than "go".

    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22

    The note in question might be on March 27: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22. I sent a note asking about two drafts, one of which has since expired (and is an informative reference in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment). We didn't make a decision about draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment, and maybe we should have. In any event, I think we will make a decision in this thread.



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email