IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-01.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 03 June 2021 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B735B3A2C03; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4oBvELxSqlAS; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF31B3A2BFF; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id t8so4325892pgb.9; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=BOnYTY5/YUu9pw+t2s9OpOiq97vbHpmq7Ijyw1V6Krk=; b=DUlGz0BiA2YNgzlYGLywayJOBhiMy7S1y2WNqmSzjvkHmJNzPiOy8UCXMXw5s6f6ge SJmF1UW6KVP/tjJZeU0a8w6IGUGCq6W4wA1J//n8xv0vU11VS8oXHsYy7jy0huCVvzEX I6gayoh4HDWUbJUDIPJ2QTlUZESZUyOnoOsOmiNF+vw1zer4Ac/A3DS57s5gN0B5xxUD XCkQYzCaFW+yRiNspdLxc56vudD7fxB+4XWumV1gmXFE7d6Z4SQt66IqWFAag6nUCnRx ZqLp0QCHdCwazWfbxHpqjG+U2FsttuaoUKewzW5IXQuexgaG4HPkB+ehxas21+ZOJfzN 1loA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=BOnYTY5/YUu9pw+t2s9OpOiq97vbHpmq7Ijyw1V6Krk=; b=Y9IerHmrcC8uTpwId6evBRyMQFo6HPD51yLMyOMMOSVf/uON0mRbrvhvuU0Cb1cFU8 6RgkHVRYy4Px57xgrLhoiNLsy7vk9AORVEYgKIRySVRvTNxebil3fZQbMpvkV5051NYa xK5jGDPKmG7wV8obZ3175DpX2nhH8d2KSPYrg+tOn6kyL9oemYkOx2+PTGmCUd1mQUax PvloOKYcLOnQ3aMAbqMbfXKYK0kKRxlcWsjqrRFEM6TTQlOxAHQg9rmkAUYiKrzP8hC5 uHaydRSJSobWuj22yZL3mFnfNSltXe5psGWLQ+Lmzr7HzOVR7S8KGpyq4IFd1Jcd5OrY pKlg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533EMPmCH7tNpxB70UBHdqLmYXenJK7gyX236f6w9cBq0pplNwRD Xghu3uMFvjn3nbBNkz6/Jdb84BiPKDM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHYRYEJQQdsWMsfNQLOVjItaTw4ONJSVxbweRtJtq3cAqqKwxiAvG4M37TeoZ6jc5RrEGZXg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:804b:0:b029:2e9:c897:aa7c with SMTP id j72-20020a62804b0000b02902e9c897aa7cmr19777921pfd.12.1622701438854; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:8802:5b00:bc1::1032]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r92sm1250647pja.6.2021.06.02.23.23.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9B3C50B8-D404-4556-8ED0-04037EE491AB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6CE165F-2528-43D3-B1DE-0BECBAA84406"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:23:56 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4D1355CF-D62C-4BAB-8DC8-8FB2822CF854@consulintel.es>
Cc: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <162254159656.7448.7482055154071850824@ietfa.amsl.com> <9da707a66e10475bb98abae5e3f7cb3f@huawei.com> <01D305D0-276E-4D66-9AC3-ED038C5AD11E@gmail.com> <4D1355CF-D62C-4BAB-8DC8-8FB2822CF854@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iDSMNYeaxRmztYcgviKzuQGuJPY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:24:05 -0000


> On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:07 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> 
> You asked (around March if I recall correctly) on the adoption of this draft and another one and for some reason authors understood that the signal was "go" for both documents.

Well, in my defense, a *question* is not an *answer*. "Should we say 'go'?" is different than "go".

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22

The note in question might be on March 27: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22. I sent a note asking about two drafts, one of which has since expired (and is an informative reference in draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment). We didn't make a decision about draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment, and maybe we should have. In any event, I think we will make a decision in this thread.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email