Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-smith-v6ops-ce-dhcpv6-transparency

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 21 October 2013 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0EF11E836F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHlWMdjJi-SC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C91911E8365 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id tp5so11203987ieb.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=zu5vINMbYTpYHs5XXBhuYcJbEa/lWdOCGTMtUFB54cI=; b=BNRd3pP22L7J1YRthOtnX+2KOr35v5DHmvcmoXXmtRdktZIgwN9lPThFH5463tCiPI D9bFagkPxsHPL9TbyHL3TnCL/6gqc8cmIGud1aYrca72l5FUhV0FpH3Bet5WkA8LoYd4 uZZvMiLAlvqRNI02dYvKO5x9JM9lo+xddZfjpFbDsIIKjVGC4bWTJAoxQlvUkvTS/n/2 mb8E6CcdTl5d9MDywfKdJj1paW87auHqAKZHAvRrx55Mba5kLUtiirkDOg8B+Mb3KzwP jcSfuY/6xEP9m0cG53Z2G+nEYpY9eomztegH2gKMyen7Zx34fPYP2Jk5OwWTUSKWDBZc Q8Hw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=zu5vINMbYTpYHs5XXBhuYcJbEa/lWdOCGTMtUFB54cI=; b=B0z2NrRVHc6xxK/Qe7sJpw6Bfu7T8O00XQZ/2zrn4Uskb6cSrbYX5X3VPfcV7Tmlhq T9Mi/UUhh6kQhuo5izkYEdwV8VkAk7WH1pcF+p8921P92Uff5SBR2jvOoAQq0jf6LLpV v+MLIssr2x6Mc6JfJqp9AuZN7Zqbzuk3z38b9eLL/IArdaUDad5IZc7IJw4V8iYjha/Q dAMP+eKlsEHJ467eb+QJ12B2H8QDNnzY6pw2ffx8JPLzbEOHXtEJ6c+rcUO2xE/pzSKn 6haNkwgzvEFM3QvaryY1ME4+XtJqE7tedlRhwNHebE45e9SO2FMiWEji7v7azYEwImbO lM4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4I+1sx711EsYG7MitdQvdvwsFqYSGyLrgRmLhMsXRf9EUoy17d4Vx1uzZG4VDy9M4C3HbZ3KcuXlyHxHBURO/CvUJIGDIHHWXdFONnplFe3wZ5HDbzdZsPdOg7TS/RoHzhGLQ7NON/bBLwKUjwLatgCBODw2TBx6lFW/P5tN7lfsKrmpnaMcd7fuu7BmJrbKIZVgx
X-Received: by 10.42.48.202 with SMTP id t10mr9685649icf.9.1382344709152; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 01:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3FA123B5-FC2C-4934-BD64-87D3E515D333@nominum.com>
References: <201307301245.r6UCj0k13216@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <3FA123B5-FC2C-4934-BD64-87D3E515D333@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:38:08 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr10d2GYXYeF+N6Zn8tbBRw3qquHxCNxLUzw8u4RBE9V8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e8e8858cc0e04e93c35ab
Cc: draft-smith-v6ops-ce-dhcpv6-transparency@tools.ietf.org, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "homenet-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <homenet-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-smith-v6ops-ce-dhcpv6-transparency
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:38:45 -0000

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> > A new draft has been posted, at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-v6ops-ce-dhcpv6-transparency.
> Please take a look at it and comment.
>
> Aside from these comments, the general flow of the proposed solution seems
> right.


Actually, I'm not sure this is the right approach. For example, it would
seem to be incompatible with the homenet approach of acquiring
configuration via DHCPv6 at the edge of the homenet network and then
passing that information around inside the homenet.

Given that this document is targeted at exactly the same problem that
homenet is attempting to solve, I'd rather see this work be moved to
homenet, where a lot more thinking has been done on this problem already,
than taking it on in an operational group without necessarily considering
the implications on the designs that homenet is working on.