Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00)
EricLKlein@softhome.net Mon, 28 July 2008 13:58 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246BE3A67DB for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vE-8pDbocZ5 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C43A68DE for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KNTEU-0005NR-PC for v6ops-data@psg.com; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:57:50 +0000
Received: from [66.54.152.27] (helo=jive.SoftHome.net) by psg.com with smtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <EricLKlein@softhome.net>) id 1KNTEP-0005Mc-Ek for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:57:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 24345 invoked by uid 417); 28 Jul 2008 13:57:39 -0000
Received: from mambo- (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.2.15) by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2008 13:57:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 417) by softhome.net with local; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:57:39 -0600
References: <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F0458A939C9@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F0458A939C9@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
From: EricLKlein@softhome.net
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, " <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>"@SoftHome.net
Subject: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:57:39 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: EricLKlein@softhome.net
X-Originating-IP: [212.143.69.97]
Message-ID: <courier.488DD053.00005A33@softhome.net>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>
Slightly off topic, but I just came cross 2 articles that try to explain to the public what the v6-to-v4 issue is about and seem to indicate that this will be very big in Dublin: Take a look at these, they are both very heavy with quotes (or are written by) people involved with v6 but not this discussion. After staunch resistance, NAT may come to IPv6 after all By Iljitsch van Beijnum - http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080722-after-staunch-resistance-nat-m ay-come-to-ipv6-after-all.html Much-maligned feature being added to IPv6 Standards body weighs network address translators for next-gen Internet By Carolyn Duffy Marsan - http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072108-ipv6nat.html (quotes Fred Baker) IETF Chair Russ Housley says NATs are "necessary for a smooth transition from IPv4 to IPv6." These seems to be saying that v6NAT will be added, but if you read through both articles it is more of the 6to4 issue with a bad marketing slant. We need to watch this or we will be fighting inappropriate expectations. Eric
- comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-r… Dave Thaler
- Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft… EricLKlein
- Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on d… Brian E Carpenter
- Public awareness of v6 & NAT (was comments on dra… EricLKlein