Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00)
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 28 July 2008 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494F03A6AB4 for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.722
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.722 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.828, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, WHOIS_NETSOLPR=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LeMmu4jcUY4J for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59473A6892 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KNU8B-000DFe-Ou for v6ops-data@psg.com; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:55:23 +0000
Received: from [209.85.146.183] (helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>) id 1KNU82-000DDa-N9 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:55:21 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so3046456waf.23 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wB8M/cjHxZRKDaPANIJ71RQ4mbIVgm53eDu8hnT3v5E=; b=UcD/itDXndSfp0lyktjSseYNbXSSaFR4VrgycLntCX8IhzVeoo4/i1ovzWgam7q2H8 3JO86jlGTRVG6EH3MHYA4/J84lCm+VeBBwxaHFGQpOCezieW1Q7ZYkP3PI27K5EnyII2 3YBewWZdto2EZwbasW2fAuu3LyTcapUYgR23E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bnDt0NlWyKYWwYRk+TZo2Cjy3UGPNW8+UWPKoEpnBLLIqobH/6QcZVWQl3q1XXKqJz pWvKAte6SHDizDkRljHpMA4GYCzzX1z+7GncmZ3rSe4AAhNCD1LMAW5KpTSh4kzYTvY8 qhIUHJSpoulOSgXEoXoL1SwOwauAwaiteXE1w=
Received: by 10.114.196.1 with SMTP id t1mr5055588waf.80.1217256913876; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.129.23.42? ( [130.129.23.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m31sm18403021wag.21.2008.07.28.07.54.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <488DDD9B.7050007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:54:19 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: EricLKlein@softhome.net
CC: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00)
References: <E9CACA3D8417CE409FE3669AAE1E5A4F0458A939C9@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <courier.488DD053.00005A33@softhome.net>
In-Reply-To: <courier.488DD053.00005A33@softhome.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>
Eric, please don't use the abbreviation "6to4" except for
RFC 3056, otherwise people will get very confused.
Frankly we can't expect headline writers at the trade rags
to capture the subtleties of this debate. All the actual
quotes from Russ in Carolyn's article seem fine, and
obviously what Iljitsch writes is correct.
Brian
On 2008-07-29 01:57, EricLKlein@softhome.net wrote:
> Slightly off topic, but I just came cross 2 articles that try to explain
> to the public what the v6-to-v4 issue is about and seem to indicate that
> this will be very big in Dublin:
> Take a look at these, they are both very heavy with quotes (or are
> written by) people involved with v6 but not this discussion.
> After staunch resistance, NAT may come to IPv6 after all By Iljitsch van
> Beijnum -
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080722-after-staunch-resistance-nat-m
> ay-come-to-ipv6-after-all.html
>
> Much-maligned feature being added to IPv6
> Standards body weighs network address translators for next-gen Internet
> By Carolyn Duffy Marsan -
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072108-ipv6nat.html (quotes Fred
> Baker) IETF Chair Russ Housley says NATs are "necessary for a smooth
> transition from IPv4 to IPv6."
> These seems to be saying that v6NAT will be added, but if you read
> through both articles it is more of the 6to4 issue with a bad marketing
> slant.
> We need to watch this or we will be fighting inappropriate expectations.
> Eric
>
>
- comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-r… Dave Thaler
- Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on draft… EricLKlein
- Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Public talking abouit 6to4 (was comments on d… Brian E Carpenter
- Public awareness of v6 & NAT (was comments on dra… EricLKlein