IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-baker-v6ops-cpe-autoconfigure-00.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Tue, 20 June 2017 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31F5127444 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xIjDEerQR0H for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579781315D6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7936441B99 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A0841B95; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 388DBAA0B; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:25:16 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:25:16 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170620182516.GV45648@Space.Net>
References: <149773408722.14141.1243099989313191246.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <334ACBB6-C438-410B-81D7-49269AC51004@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <334ACBB6-C438-410B-81D7-49269AC51004@gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YEGoLZOaSOh83wKr_AChGgl5QBo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-baker-v6ops-cpe-autoconfigure-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:25:40 -0000

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 02:21:09PM -0700, Fred Baker wrote:
> So I have a question. Do we need to spell this out for CPE vendors? 

Yes.

If it's not mandated by telcos that buy large numbers of CPE (or CERs),
vendors will ship "what they think the market wants", and that currently
seems to be "it will do IPv4 + NAT".

German computer magazine C't tests every new router for "will it work
with IPv6 on a dual-stack connection to Deutsche Telekom" - which is 
one of the dominant players in the market here - and half the devices 
fail.  Today.  Many years after DT started to turn on IPv6 by default
on all new customer DSL lines.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email