IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00.txt

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D831294AD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDLUIpgSR6ev for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3011294A9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049462.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v1M0ZPa6025623; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:42:16 -0500
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 28rwkk3c9g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:42:16 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1M0gGv2027896; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:42:16 -0500
Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1M0g9dL027819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:42:11 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (GAALPA1MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.218.154]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:41:51 GMT
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.76]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.154]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:41:51 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSjIAmzvhblLtaeUmv4ODS24LKk6F0LK1g
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:41:51 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DAC7803@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <148763027040.25952.5914924936449771028.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <692043A0-04F2-46EA-84D2-D4964E925C6B@consulintel.es> <03B10A5B-ABE3-4515-90B9-D16A41039229@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <03B10A5B-ABE3-4515-90B9-D16A41039229@google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.251.237]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DAC7803GAALPA1MSGUSRBF_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-02-21_21:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1612050000 definitions=main-1702220005
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/YniIi1KC2Jm6IUm1nR8_rJ5zshw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:42:20 -0000

Sorry, James, I disagree.
The charter of v6ops is still doing things that help get IPv6 rolled out. Which is exactly what these ISPs are asking for help with. Which has nothing to do with multi-router home network topologies.

I believe a very targeted document to meet the needs of these ISPs is what we should be aiming for.
Barbara

From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of james woodyatt
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:22 PM
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-00.txt

On Feb 21, 2017, at 01:11, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es<mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es>> wrote:

I’ve submitted a -bis draft for updating RFC7084 (Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers).

I strongly believe that any update to RFC 7084 that doesn’t REQUIRE the LAN interfaces to provide HNCP services [RFC 7788] is an incomplete update.

--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com<mailto:jhw@google.com>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email