Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 03 July 2014 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32A31B2AAF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mlaN6sSaQxLw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667821B2800 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r20so11748451wiv.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tXPElJycUMabIK0o8drtXb/wnBm0mHBPIIXxVazuMjE=; b=c/4ObokU3uXjsMMWgxaKZWaf5Szef3SL9FDftnLg7SNLWNaodMwQMNy5LGlTkcu8Ei A2XUgvF0E7eHhiHLxdlzxwc61bJWvujWmHAXFJVfKzeNgcA2l+Id83L09woxvYohA4Hx RVa3i1SdOFJTP6lCy8nLiTSyfZOMN0g8tdBrvQPy8BSuZB00QeaBUgVSGePk3AP++k2C WG6uRAynxAvACNOKD0/ohj8C/VrDM7v2H//7Wf3lBI5YP5cuocHUsTPFyO2rt5EEe4tG dyhvBKQIqfw5kbplsgpztI0j1mWUsYlEJpwMOMvcV2kNRLKrkaS+IBDZkI6acC4tNvyU ncsg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.89.138 with SMTP id bo10mr6181366wjb.22.1404405224995; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.63.211 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 09:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <504ED52D-B94C-4758-AE07-17789EF4FD2E@cisco.com>
References: <43AE4B9F-206F-4969-81B8-AE003DC9DF4C@cisco.com> <8392F9BAC6AD5F47920216A6D7853F7E1D62B8CF@BPXM02GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> <504ED52D-B94C-4758-AE07-17789EF4FD2E@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:33:44 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9opwsb0oI2Q386FQZKWskBZxtew
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcWkyO0-UcAvti55-2_RLV+gY_YBSXFAViWX_iYNx5g2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Zoj_wrlYSeJNUwNiKAKrLWBfCNQ
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "Ata, Shingo (ata@info.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp)" <ata@info.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:33:48 -0000
At Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:21:32 +0000, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > > v6ops: > > Kitamura-san has posted draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free, and would like operational views on it. He has also requested agenda time at IETF 90. I suspect it may be more suited for 6man, but 6man isn’t meeting. Would you kindly take a look and comment? > > If there is operational interest, we can give him a slot. FWIW, there was a discussion at 6man on a previous version of the draft: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg19286.html I gave my own comments in that thread. I've not read the 03 version, and in any case I wouldn't be able to make a useful comment on whether it has operational interest as I'm not a professional operator. -- JINMEI, Tatuya
- [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90 Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90 Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90 Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Planning for IETF #90 Alejandro Acosta