IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 and DNSSEC

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com> Wed, 29 July 2015 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20271B34D7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQ1UHiiuvZ04 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [130.37.15.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481E31A702F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 01:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1ZKMsw-0000CCC; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:38:46 +0200
Message-Id: <m1ZKMsw-0000CCC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507230910190.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4797B33E-9851-427E-8710-84122AFD0FFA@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:00:01 +0000 ." <4797B33E-9851-427E-8710-84122AFD0FFA@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:38:45 +0200
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZorHsfGHv6J-IowcqH6_v2VFr78>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] NAT64/DNS64 and DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 08:38:50 -0000

In your letter dated Wed, 29 Jul 2015 03:00:01 +0000 you wrote:
>Between us girls, I don't think many of us really like NAT64...

I don't like it either. But there seems to be a vocal group of operators who
like it. Not a lot of opposition and now Apple seems to like it as well.

So the only way forward is to make it work.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email