[v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6 PD
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 17 September 2025 14:49 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: v6ops@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A88164498D5 for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JmB_8S5Fj0pp for <v6ops@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F0D6449800 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b07c081660aso996361966b.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1758120520; x=1758725320; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZTYYNerYTgTUoPg+mDza1iCsYD44ferDa6vXvs5kbDs=; b=dRw81ZS9mHRiD9gfrRk0uz80HevxX98rAnyoCOY/txGJ9i7Y4LPdjZKCrH+rtKLpVt WXrXoQ7uwnHMuYS/vLmAFwnJudsFbRN9nPUiH7NQgeO1nC+Uu2iqAL2jNUsduqngV8Y3 z7Zuaq99WQCowQgAsdHyn6t/+kDsZrii2pLd/Co59u+yv7o32uENBgLJsJtH34n/i4xU LrTZbuoHD0bEqcknvOZOx72+zcCHUa9VvC3taN+LqKKDvlFQ28eC9haCdtqNuihcE/N/ PHUbSL0KDWTCqvkfnBQ6IaC129t6F7DJ8z1PvIWOzKAH+Ih4+an8pqnCviwVrxoE/vOS O4bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758120520; x=1758725320; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ZTYYNerYTgTUoPg+mDza1iCsYD44ferDa6vXvs5kbDs=; b=K2WAk9zOjUkC2QBEToquBAgQiYeIHRzXnhHZjdxLslnAht9YqMMQnOv0FD3rbbBZlv 5vpZKqUPUb7t5sCDOUqiz4UK466gLCxwzJ0L48aeO8kVKnVTV50k94aTFz4c+kmmJTgb S4MIXLM5oqQ1M4NyC11yqTWbmGRDJ2DtuQLqlKRsL0faSNYqytT58G3eN5lLINo13Kyn KkJVfQXFVkypkLLdybhdEPm3nDpQP3xLqgU4D8An9x97u3nPxRNK6tMTRhyAhyholQ+b chWM8Eyk0ptiyU1fjagTzIngDLDS1tfJ6h4X5GgiS4oxeuY1ZPXBUTdKHeMgWOm+/ywE qjEg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVjBlU+oNvv+0hYuHQykUJAaAYEcWw5xtv2DU81ySZBq+01XT5gH/HHSR6T+uN4kynW1kaZKw==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzZjWVley0Fcg2gwFqtBgL/gIM/YHh1zFn9tYZvYocEBLoRPp5U e1T9yhnW5+8X4/r1C2alPzMZKNMoTVr8PQ6rEbvZfbe4jClK3yX53Svmb1yUWgmWAGCJLzIu7f4 RxFw0IAIz3dWXfux+hOKqqNG2RfA2kSRB7fkzf3IY
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs1xY76jnC5AdVhjQ8UohS2iIScQgfpKvS5zPdMgkMT6ixo5nHY9vW3freJ26c Uiam77KfltbukLzqzSdwQrRB0r5jzviBDto6kldXJISulVfanPuYKVO2KmC818tUNS/I/TnUzDM lpDUugR4W46sd1UC4QKfzU7+1y5bsdluqeNxyuRt/Lb5TGk9TJcO+Lp0jNRdiBOydaMrk328kI2 Ko4dpT0nR/npMI9mxQU8MU6xggLa9e74fvjtXG9zBxGB22nLMLPnEfClA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCGb/r0sRmMnyKybyXh/2IPCi8ir1VQoCKX8ReJc0HAoQCJXYR34nUNpsSAdizJ3z1+nagYVdh+egBXHjf79c=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:969e:b0:b04:85f2:d26f with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b1bb73a737bmr360371466b.25.1758120519605; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 07:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKD1Yr1XKoBNJqBbuiR1ZthZPTqaN+099RdhhHTSSGJBF5EUpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP6_FRxO5Oem05cAMOuKK=ckR6VOG_pQteJzNkjES6czSVmvdw@mail.gmail.com> <CANP3RGcAhHX859-9EW4ozUJYYHaeaYsK7pqbBb-ytuqyT-ZTEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr32GdvEhh7kKCuPT3RGoKo0ojo-W6Kiy-euD1aP9RjpLg@mail.gmail.com> <DB9PR07MB7771A785A9FF09DEA6E66D7DD614A@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr1g8=6B9o4BNtrKaeLvTajuQ8P4rjv-N+15UOAMXPujhA@mail.gmail.com> <aMl8I5H8zgIDNeWD@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2wcDYLB3jR7A6b59mZ+_Pd29DUpXxpw7uF7XerUQEyN8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr33X3cFLAKhwTMtEYYKgeDnrSvZVsL1aNyLphoQ0-88Ew@mail.gmail.com> <PAXPR07MB77735B7BB2A5B344B3A32789D617A@PAXPR07MB7773.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR07MB77735B7BB2A5B344B3A32789D617A@PAXPR07MB7773.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:48:27 +0900
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWB9QqgFJ10ME0VKFZgntHzdLDVUMNmULRNqAiGSr59HNnawtaVf8ak2B3w
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0GsYPM4wSGiZ=-m0-W_T5kbYTKir2p3tQc223fdimr1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000bd995063f0055b2"
Message-ID-Hash: 7R6E4UNFN4QF2XZILQKIH4222RBWW4UQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7R6E4UNFN4QF2XZILQKIH4222RBWW4UQ
X-MailFrom: lorenzo@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Maciej ??enczykowski <maze@google.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6 PD
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ZtZxuzWzL-ftn5YYfPrj2n8UHO8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
FWIW a university campus network seems like a great use case for DHCPv6 PD. It's very similar to a mobile network in that it provides access to large numbers of unmanaged devices. Per-device subnets (either using PD or using RAs as described in RFC 8273) should make it easy to support large numbers of devices without scaling issues and should make it easier to defend against on-link ND attacks. Speaking of the address policy specifically, the wording in the current policy seems to ban RFC 8273 as well, since in RFC 8273 the network provides a /64 prefix for every device - it just uses RAs to do so instead of PD. On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 11:41 PM Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote: > On 17/09/2025, 01:36, "Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 17 Sept 2025, 09:17 Mark Smith, <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > > If but anyone had warned of this outcome before. > > > > If you're worried about IPv6 address space running out, you might want to > have a look at the original IPv6 proposal in RFC 8507, which proposed a 64 > bit address space. > > > > There's no need to look at history here. We can just observe that all > cellular networks assign two or more /64s to every device by default, all > the time. That is the industry standard and was strongly argued for by the > IETF when mobile operators originally designed the standards to assign only > a single /128 per device. > > > > Why RIPE would have a policy that allows cellular networks to provide > multiple /64s per device but doesn't allow, say, enterprise networks to do > the same seems somewhat arbitrary and unfair. After all, both of these are > IETF-standard deployment models. > > > > Well, “RIPE” is just a community of people, that could redefine/clarify > that policy to reflect modern reality. > > > > As an NREN advocating campuses deploy IPv6, we have to justify giving more > than a /48 to an organisation, and if DHCP-PD isn’t acceptable then those > organisations will need to look at LIR status. That’s not currently an > expensive proposition, in the grand scheme of university finances. An NREN > can route such LIR space alongside assignments from its own space, as we do. > > > > Tim >
- [v6ops] Android now supports DHCPv6 PD Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: Android now supports DHCPv6 PD Stan Barber
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Maciej Żenczykowski
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mark Smith
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now supports DHCPv6… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mark Smith
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: Android now… Geoff Huston
- [v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mark Smith
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Michael Richardson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tore Anderson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Jen Linkova
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Nick Hilliard
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tore Anderson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mark Smith
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Michael Richardson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Mikael Abrahamsson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Jen Linkova
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ivan Pepelnjak
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ondřej Caletka
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Gert Doering
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Daryll Swer
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tore Anderson
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Re: [dhcwg] Re: Re: [IPv6]Re: Android now… jordi.palet@consulintel.es