Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4890 (3985)

Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu> Sun, 18 May 2014 13:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mohacsi@niif.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA581A00C2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 06:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.295
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_HU=1.35, HOST_EQ_HU=1.245, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUAQzZ7PZDIN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 May 2014 06:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu (strudel.ki.iif.hu [IPv6:2001:738:0:411:20f:1fff:fe6e:ec1e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19101A0075 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 May 2014 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [193.225.14.181]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3D94C3; Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bolha.lvs.iif.hu
Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu ([IPv6:::ffff:193.6.222.244]) by bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [::ffff:193.225.14.72]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G++bPrWg1+J2; Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 9002) id 6DBFA506; Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644864C3; Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 15:17:30 +0200
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
X-X-Sender: mohacsi@strudel.ki.iif.hu
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8DA928AC-FCAF-4AB6-BE39-C6D155C91F17@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1405181516130.7711@strudel.ki.iif.hu>
References: <20140514000750.1AF7818000E@rfc-editor.org> <8DA928AC-FCAF-4AB6-BE39-C6D155C91F17@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/_CKREtjpgadxSDzW1EWnFgU4Qw8
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, "jamesrobertson@live.com" <jamesrobertson@live.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4890 (3985)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 13:17:40 -0000

Dear Fred and alls,
 	I looked it, and it seems to me the errata should be accepted.
 	Kinest Regards,

Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882

On Thu, 15 May 2014, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

> Guys:
>
> Do we agree with this?
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 5:07 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4890,
>> "Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4890&eid=3985
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: James Robertson <jamesrobertson@live.com>
>>
>> Section: Appendix B
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> if [ "$STATE_ENABLED" -eq "1" ]
>> then
>>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
>>  # only for existing sessions
>>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
>>  do
>>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -m state -p icmpv6 \
>>         -d $inner_prefix \
>>         --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --icmpv6-type packet-too-big \
>>         -j ACCEPT
>>  done
>> else
>>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
>>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
>>  do
>>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -p icmpv6 -d $inner_prefix \
>>         --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit -j ACCEPT
>>  done
>> fi
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> if [ "$STATE_ENABLED" -eq "1" ]
>> then
>>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
>>  # only for existing sessions
>>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
>>  do
>>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -m state -p icmpv6 \
>>     -d $inner_prefix \
>>     --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit \
>>     -j ACCEPT
>>  done
>> else
>>  # Allow incoming time exceeded code 0 messages
>>  for inner_prefix in $INNER_PREFIXES
>>  do
>>    ip6tables -A icmpv6-filter -p icmpv6 -d $inner_prefix \
>>         --icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transit -j ACCEPT
>>  done
>> fi
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> RFC 4890 Errata ID 2706 states that icmpv6-type packet-too-big should
>> state icmpv6-type ttl-zero-during-transmit. This should read
>> ttl-zero-during-transit.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC4890 (draft-ietf-v6ops-icmpv6-filtering-recs-03)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in Firewalls
>> Publication Date    : May 2007
>> Author(s)           : E. Davies, J. Mohacsi
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : IPv6 Operations
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>