Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem

On 9/2/14 6:39 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> 
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> BTW the draft name is a bit schlonky. Isn't there supposed to be an -ietf in there?

I was asked to change the name after the presentation so I interpreted
that a inv9tationtion to do so.

in practice I tend to be guided by the metadata in the tracker and not
by the unstructured string that is the filename. that said at some point
I was bit sloppy.

> Well, only after we have seen fit to make it a working group draft; I would expect a ‘-jaeggli’ in the corresponding position. Our beloved AD seems to have difficulties reproducing names that IETF tools recognize, and in counting. The history of its name is:
> 
> -rw-r--r--  1 fred  admin  11001 Feb 15  2014 draft-v6ops-jaeggli-pmtud-ecmp-problem-00.txt
> -rw-r--r--  1 fred  admin  13661 Mar  5  2014 draft-v6ops-jaeggli-pmtud-ecmp-problem-01.txt
> -rw-r--r--  1 fred  admin  13590 Jun  2 17:26 draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-00.txt
> -rw-rw-r--  1 fred  admin  14643 Jul  4 02:51 draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-01.txt
> -rw-r--r--  1 fred  admin  15293 Aug 25 09:22 draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-00.txt
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem

Attachment: signature.asc