IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 02 September 2014 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515641A2119 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJp_ReOpRh18 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFDAE1A0BEB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1296; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409702101; x=1410911701; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Xty1JZEmdntIgNr6ng5xc9Ns4Ei8KUhDu1LiOEOHYOM=; b=ezzh2Jvvx8TxVQ2SJTnp+SekTEs2h1synbqPjLCL8j13BAIDyO+9f5lh Kqml61qy+a9Snn6jJ9QKuxEvl7MJR6ODLZ0zXolpduEX9PijhpVXraL+1 B3ZXSJDhxHYnEIvXSuCMesugxMotAkOiMgXdFdFHKNcn1gRpLahfk0uNe U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQFAIRYBlStJA2I/2dsb2JhbABagw2BKgTPcwGBDxZ3hAQBAQMBeQULAgEIDjgyJQIEDgUOiCwIvSIBF49NB4MvgR0BBJExggaBSodblR6DYWyBSIEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,452,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="74398393"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2014 23:55:01 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s82Nt1oQ031499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Sep 2014 23:55:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:55:01 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
Thread-Index: AQHPxwlOcD8eKfElLkGO/GIcD7swRA==
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:55:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D9841A05-2016-48FB-BC4E-43F6F400DD93@cisco.com>
References: <201408251147.s7PBl2b6010099@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <301104B4-78F7-4B55-86EB-0712FFB7D4DD@cisco.com> <540585CE.8020701@globis.net>
In-Reply-To: <540585CE.8020701@globis.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.127.128]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F68506C6-388A-49B2-961C-E78ED667D859"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kOPSYUOcYoyn8wMT3aoJh-TwP84
Cc: "draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem@tools.ietf.org" <draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:55:03 -0000

On Sep 2, 2014, at 6:54 PM, Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> wrote:

> Would a draft summarizing the ICMP PTB problem, investigating potential alternative sources of path MTU information, and alternative signaling mechanisms for path MTU, fit within v6ops remit?

I think this draft is trying to be that. What would definitely be within our remit would be operational advice, as in "advice from operators to operators", and advice to other working groups of the form "X needs to be improved, we like Y, but it has problems {Z}". What would be outside our remit would be changes to protocols.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email