Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes

Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3901B21F8E1F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YH8w3JKf1cgn for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC3621F8E3D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id ec20so1993738lab.41 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0N6alyMvycYHNQjsqAT9iUEGirqE6iMtSCmvS3bUzgI=; b=lQOmUMeXZ331sUpjNapbDOxZ0uYblo3edbSDFFLDLmKu7GuXWFTxHGf99bKYkRkpzF TxwR3/7k4rMsbm4+FftFe+uQ307Zafk2qCS6vTE4nexfh6Pndyu3eIzt3utWDPmmLbu+ fAoVIlG+I67pMDPMvVOVEaeVaFZbbwEXKTeSCLhadcgiXNVaRrPgAl0y28NVegF5tNvR glv+DhWg48fwbi/PaUT54jyoK6pSI438kx0e+snca4fQcdyXlkfWTDTn7moOj+BiOFhX DNSMjZQsMEqOGS8hSH2DO2BLxKGbAWUBEYFgFYcXE6Om2XpjkRaMLWuL4F1KP6+6TRGc Zxjg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.29.17 with SMTP id f17mr4352372lbh.20.1374111520725; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.218.42 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:38:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKOT5KqHzp9EXK4+PXT_J72h7CNXptD-Arot1x8xSy70kKp9+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133c690131f9f04e1bf451e"
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:38:43 -0000

Hello,
I agree with Victor on the following:
>Links to MIF documents may be useful here.
the document would benefit from some references to mif documents

>In section 3.1 the, the text is prescriptive in suggesting one dose not
use multiple provisioning domains (DHCP) to configure hosts
agree this text is to prescrictive and the document  seems to take a
strong position without enough explanations/rationals

>am not sure this document should suggest how to deal with it, but perhaps
point to other documents which deal with multiple addresses which
 > provision across multiple domains.
there are ongoing discussions in other WGs in opinion this draft should
refer to the ongoing work instead of taking its own conclusion

Thanks,
Regards
Roberta


regards,

Victor  K