IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-chown-v6ops-call-to-arms WGLC

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 13 May 2011 06:48 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA75E06A6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YbpYtxObTxo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844D5E0657 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 23173jjaeggli.local (c-98-234-216-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4D6m4tx009492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 May 2011 06:48:05 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4DCCD421.9040700@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:48:01 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <5F8FA59F-A660-4EAD-8CFF-1D2BE442B37D@cisco.com> <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C8D56A@PDAWM12B.ad.sprint.com> <CB2C571D-1C9B-4384-8F81-BC62CE6B72C6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB2C571D-1C9B-4384-8F81-BC62CE6B72C6@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Fri, 13 May 2011 06:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Stig Venaas <svenaas@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>, IPv6 Operations Working Group <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-chown-v6ops-call-to-arms WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 06:48:41 -0000

On 5/12/11 11:35 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> 
> On May 2, 2011, at 11:38 AM, George, Wes E [NTK] wrote:
> 
>> Overall, I think that this document is quite good. My main concern
>> is that even between now and June, it really should be a living 
>> document rather than the static document that an IETF draft that
>> moves towards RFC becomes.
> 
> Question for Stig and Tim, and anyone else that wants to chime in.
> The authors will do another update to incorporate the few (but
> detailed) comments we have received during WGLC. From my perspective,
> I don't see a problem with holding off until June to file it with
> Ron.
> 
> But - what would the objective be? It seems like the purpose of
> holding it off is either to add new things to test, or to report on
> the testing. Tim, Stig, others? What do you want to see happen here? 

putting it a different way, do we expect material improvement with age?

> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list 
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email