IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-chown-v6ops-call-to-arms WGLC

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 13 May 2011 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18ADE06ED for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhBDMOixHxDR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF25E06A7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=795; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1305268564; x=1306478164; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EDJ+B+q5q4gPB0/jSL8KZTO5CXqkdCKkHT59GdtSkqY=; b=QHb+OmqxQDnpaPaWqdu8vDP2syJAj9OHRXCoTRtdd4Q78NLHwJzRgxG3 IrzLjk0kDJYD0a/yaTfEJyGrUCvguz6Nz8iwVYJTmreKXEWBI7R/eT97T XlpbcYFVxf1BNhW0w6ed3m6IbyvCl0nXN7y8JxjI2bwkl/xSLm0tpuX9o U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,362,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="314745451"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2011 06:36:04 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (stealth-10-32-244-222.cisco.com [10.32.244.222]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4D6ZxLS023114; Fri, 13 May 2011 06:36:03 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Thu, 12 May 2011 23:36:03 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Thu, 12 May 2011 23:36:03 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C8D56A@PDAWM12B.ad.sprint.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:35:47 -0700
Message-Id: <CB2C571D-1C9B-4384-8F81-BC62CE6B72C6@cisco.com>
References: <5F8FA59F-A660-4EAD-8CFF-1D2BE442B37D@cisco.com> <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C8D56A@PDAWM12B.ad.sprint.com>
To: Stig Venaas <svenaas@cisco.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IPv6 Operations Working Group <v6ops@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-chown-v6ops-call-to-arms WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 06:36:04 -0000

On May 2, 2011, at 11:38 AM, George, Wes E [NTK] wrote:

> Overall, I think that this document is quite good. My main concern is that even between now and June, it really should be a living
> document rather than the static document that an IETF draft that moves towards RFC becomes. 

Question for Stig and Tim, and anyone else that wants to chime in. The authors will do another update to incorporate the few (but detailed) comments we have received during WGLC. From my perspective, I don't see a problem with holding off until June to file it with Ron.

But - what would the objective be? It seems like the purpose of holding it off is either to add new things to test, or to report on the testing. Tim, Stig, others? What do you want to see happen here?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email