IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 OPSEC drafts need review

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E948621F85C5; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N12TEdBoUsrv; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06D321F85DF; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail112-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.239) by DB3EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.3.84.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:22 +0000
Received: from mail112-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail112-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CE8C031A; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT003.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -23
X-BigFish: PS-23(zz9371I1be0I542Mzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24hf0ah107ah304l)
Received: from mail112-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail112-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1344333560458261_25474; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.231]) by mail112-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB5B1A00BB; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT003.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by DB3EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.3.87.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:19 +0000
Received: from DBXPRD0510HT005.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.252.165) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.4.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.108.4; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:59:19 +0000
Message-ID: <039d01cd7482$b1b65720$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>, opsec@ietf.org
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240674DA@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:54:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.252.165]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: draft-vyncke-opsec-v6@tools.ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, draft-jdurant-bgp-security-01@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 OPSEC drafts need review
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:59:25 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: <opsec@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-vyncke-opsec-v6@tools.ietf.org>; <v6ops@ietf.org>;
<draft-jdurant-bgp-security-01@tools.ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 9:51 AM

Dear all,

As mentioned during the OPSEC WG meeting, the following 2 drafts will in
3 weeks be considered for WG documents, after a call for feedback on the
email list. During the WG meeting it became clear that not that many
people read the documents until now.

Please read drafts:


2)      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jdurand-bgp-security-01

<tp>
Why OPSEC, when we have GROW or even IDR, neither of whom are copied on
this e-mail?

What do the chairs of those WGs say?

Tom Petch
</tp>

On Monday 27th the chairs of OPSEC WG will ask the WG during a period of
7 days for feedback on these drafts to support or deny acceptance as WG
documents.

Kind Regards,
G/, KK & Warren



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email