IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC

Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au> Tue, 07 August 2012 09:40 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4D421F8672 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CRXgSusC2zEg for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm17-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.139.53.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5F9421F8671 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.139.52.193] by nm17.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 09:39:58 -0000
Received: from [98.139.52.148] by tm6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 09:39:58 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1031.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 07 Aug 2012 09:39:58 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 289148.82094.bm@omp1031.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 94180 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Aug 2012 09:39:57 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.au; s=s1024; t=1344332397; bh=wIEPJkQfVVbYWaiwylPe8aQtrILCZKUS8xrY2l2M8Cg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NK3BC5OJqmuTEBghL7NooS74xnnpppyrmKzOkG9ZInKkdou0W3fTtrEJDVBQ9crKlP5KpmkkE4So1gmuvTtJFjS5olfrLaN3I2WZXhjz8wgQCKteLOnk59ipi+XyHi1A5AqZVBhTP8mOynCpIy8deW4ncDAC0l5S/Li1cY3/oZE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pTLwanBIwynmOgWWLwGpLwQD2lLlYc5td1WbGxUAulT3wezXIN2PW4OcJ+XN17whpEp+1lRbLvL9oKrxG4oTLLfaCUemSVlUCB0s9mDu6H+iAhmEfqlw3YzM6BRprPUkl7MTyyDMcSuKL+5HgidKoCg4iTuxtRYAPoQko4ei+RM=;
X-YMail-OSG: 5DEvjfoVM1nnZCGpqFke10yYcgluVgC1eTEhyhl2Z.xeoVz VtycLUvv21kifSqo2uPY8t.KfPyRvKlBATfbYPzMUu373ycjgtuGTqu_gG2o rpk_Bn19zOW80tK_P6JQTZIlnALuwFFOdfNy_BuYf4nU7ZI32BbCvmQURPT8 z75FjRWurwxvb3oS0WCAr50CjKgtw2JHPpb2jt.TZYp.RXMG1MZvkjDayMvW 1vXTEJg_IN4P_JtxUOUBK3jmfyPDFTOshfrGlXB9EnI4_TUD4EgTEJZ4iLZ0 EfJx0XO4wSFuz.PdYJigEFiHiJBEmauUjpYLXPQV0gy_AbYHCtq71VRhjPGj csigMl68Mm2HTRWmaCpiuwFrAJ9ra8TZlYxEZjAlhtXAhrJO70dv0RbYriu9 JzsGD9F73sOzHYlckwGaLz5FCzEy6xeJp9ipNtd5pC7xBucHZ5HJCD7Jfwt1 B5DT1gUHrFO8KcQ6yYfhKIHyPkmp_KllSBKQnN6Bpb63aBw--
Received: from [150.101.221.237] by web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:39:57 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233
References: <5F52A5BB-36F7-4CF9-9639-960C65ADFD4E@cisco.com> <CAD6AjGRMQ8o5fVHeWaOanKYomqJ0jArXS-zXm4qQdqacPS0QbA@mail.gmail.com> <5020DEC0.1090601@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1344332397.93146.YahooMailNeo@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:39:57 -0700
From: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5020DEC0.1090601@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Mark ZZZ Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:40:03 -0000

Hi,


----- Original Message -----
> From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> To: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
> Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>; V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012 7:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC
> 
> On 07/08/2012 04:59, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>>  On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
>>>  This is to open a two week Working Group last Call on
>>> 
>>>  http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance
>>>    "IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and Application Service 
> Providers",
>>>    Brian Carpenter, Sheng Jiang, 10-Jul-12
>>> 
<>
>> 
>>  It seems like NPTv6 is a much more modern approach that is much more
>>  likely to be deployed ... 
> 
> For content providers???
> 


Wouldn't NPTv6's Experimental status mean it shouldn't really be suggested in an advisory document like this? If it was mentioned, then I think there'd have to be text discussing it's drawbacks in ICP scenarios e.g. the consequences of content hosts/applications not knowing their own IPv6 identity, and discussion around NPTv6 in a situation where the "cloud" application traffic is encrypted (I think this is going to increase significantly with the rapid adoption of BYO devices and Wifi offload).

Regards,
Mark.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email