IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E5E21F8600 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66o9+UnrJY4N for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0E321F85F9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eekb45 with SMTP id b45so1038727eek.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=R1YTcBA4Vm3Tc60v8ZUuHcRF/HcGauYnzjdOqnRycfs=; b=aorT5ZV9OB+zRz1G8nh+VZIASX3nrI701hLuY0+GNKE+tfuBAMZW+C5dDuZTrBFJg9 kvQur69eurdgjzBfZRmBAnBXDxnKAMTaZUpm7WhhsTVxf7zfblW9aib1Di6o++ZvWhnM nZXUJ2u+ljLQhg7FC2s1VHcE+NrvstRcnatxdgkCmhCN5ivX8E1AYmdtWkzZ26sKjuns BSZR5F6hduKpYCcqo+Wlnz9+F3z+gjVYLuLodd99HmTI/2ZREnaABg8Yj861QS8ZuW+p vsDVjRLRVnIqNO5BtD5LHmCIAQxl/3C6c4LJ6BvaBulOEDXhoMF7qRsMvwsSiNZ/jb5u DxwQ==
Received: by 10.14.218.134 with SMTP id k6mr16946631eep.14.1344331912811; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.232.110.167] (c167.al.cl.cam.ac.uk. [128.232.110.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h2sm11604360eeo.3.2012.08.07.02.31.51 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5020E089.30201@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:31:53 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
References: <5F52A5BB-36F7-4CF9-9639-960C65ADFD4E@cisco.com> <5020C48D.6040507@redpill-linpro.com>
In-Reply-To: <5020C48D.6040507@redpill-linpro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:31:54 -0000

Tore,

On 07/08/2012 08:32, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Fred Baker (fred)
> 
>> This is to open a two week Working Group last Call on
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance "IPv6
>> Guidance for Internet Content and Application Service Providers",
>> Brian Carpenter, Sheng Jiang, 10-Jul-12
>>
>> Please read it now. We are interested in, among other things,
>> technical commentary on the draft and the working group's perception
>> on its usefulness to its target audience.
> 
> Support.
> 
> One comment, regarding section 5.2: «It is worth noting that whereas
> OSPF and RIP differ significantly between IPv4 and IPv6, IS-IS has the
> advantage of handling them both in a single instance of the protocol».
> 
> I am under the impression that OSPFv3 also has this advantage (cf. RFC
> 5838: «Support of Address Families in OSPFv3»). I haven't yet played
> with this functionality myself, though.

Good question. I have no idea, so I have sent a query to the cluenet list.

Thanks
   Brian
> 
> Best regards,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email