IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Two prefixes [draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC]

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 05:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B88F11E812D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.824
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4A2jGZ4oN61 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336BE11E812B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so728964obb.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=I3N+DUanVKPwW+dfTzF+O3perxITJliM40JDOyLktcQ=; b=bhy+Sqzbsa3HY6XEJGef8R8QI9ukNbSQxmkmsz/Zwm5XXqGdc96fK3PSf6SJuxsa8x qG272HXQPv6dGHbjqZ1hUxIwrwZD00W819aKIFCe3KV4o8JEGL+/g8LKQ5KBdo/ifU8m hE9OVeHHK+QG0Q1j7erVwiwZw1jHMdtHp8meErkPuy1BtR0gGtiPJbXTf+Jlq/Sk3wve stidpXDmFcCoOn1V6wKOWQsoJXkQY5WiCGVYWtKnlkt8px6sQIT9MVYqqFEiXnyTLsDj eU+gFkdKTiVRFWbDHXli3DjgJ0WMIt1XZN6/zz6V4MUVbiQbR5oqj2bgnUfvNbi0NXhM mOkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=I3N+DUanVKPwW+dfTzF+O3perxITJliM40JDOyLktcQ=; b=FORNu/EzReUys1T10kZDqsRt9m5520pLH7rNTRqsjjsxTeHKKuTLdPgnxci3lrIpG6 qOlqcDzSMeVzmYmsqcpbiJ0mXqIxktaZ1S4l8oFP3LdQwCoV35uIvMa3qF9MvhUv8S0/ 7VhkrmY1BBg+6PxKfysIFrwke0NhYqhSAYNfuwLk5WlGLEoJOd8SJZYXmYTZ0KycxanF W72gf1Mjtdp8tVbZJBxDdOpFhugbaZafR/iKfV5Sm2K6/MkLyU5JsswLrYujM6eFv8DJ udZItBHewvnXyzKBHC7U6Gc0Lo5C8k1BUhaVQLkMLWxqLXTLDF4wjrbH2HzAPUk09DdG plQw==
Received: by 10.182.17.99 with SMTP id n3mr28328335obd.8.1344404055755; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.17.99 with SMTP id n3mr28328323obd.8.1344404055623; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.40.65 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <50211B63.3020203@gmail.com>
References: <5F52A5BB-36F7-4CF9-9639-960C65ADFD4E@cisco.com> <CAD6AjGRMQ8o5fVHeWaOanKYomqJ0jArXS-zXm4qQdqacPS0QbA@mail.gmail.com> <5020DEC0.1090601@gmail.com> <1344332397.93146.YahooMailNeo@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <CAD6AjGSAE3=rcSo2=96qfiY_41Kq8r5cSgC0N1-fbF+msMF0bg@mail.gmail.com> <50211B63.3020203@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:33:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1_bADT7cwX9QccRickCYHxqiaDu89Qz7fhbsyZZS6r-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04446bfb2b880204c6ba7601"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkElB7Qxdrua/3eXCXtp7pmu1sgrCZDOuQrP95g/uY5subyKy6wvnkufkCXN4iJ+GCG3jcmBE2kboF/vAaw6JKF+JVTBIOYEebgEiKjsLRPa4tNIml5trfegbJmp+IlQSzJbRkvdBwynyTMn3uPAwjrfMN628KzoZKs66SubmWfFhpjXyYWeMPuiWPIpCWn6GErmwdA
Cc: V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Two prefixes [draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:34:17 -0000

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think that's unfair and kind of ignores
> draft-v6ops-multihoming-without-ipv6nat
>
> It works today. There are known difficulties with address selection
> and with ingress filtering, of course. And it's a bit more fiddly to
> configure routing and DNS for IT crews used to the old way of doing things.
> But it really isn't unknown territory.
>

If I were a content provider, I would think twice before choosing an
architecture that breaks TCP connections when upstreams go down.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email