IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC

Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AA411E809C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Il2Rg3ARE9rM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zimbra.redpill-linpro.com (zimbra.redpill-linpro.com [87.238.49.234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446AD11E8087 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 00:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.redpill-linpro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B4182000F; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:32:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at claudius.linpro.no
Received: from zimbra.redpill-linpro.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.redpill-linpro.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1KEtLvQQeVM; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from echo.linpro.no (echo.linpro.no [87.238.42.42]) by zimbra.redpill-linpro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98262182000C; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:32:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5020C48D.6040507@redpill-linpro.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:32:29 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
Organization: Redpill Linpro AS
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <5F52A5BB-36F7-4CF9-9639-960C65ADFD4E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5F52A5BB-36F7-4CF9-9639-960C65ADFD4E@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 07:32:33 -0000

* Fred Baker (fred)

> This is to open a two week Working Group last Call on
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance "IPv6
> Guidance for Internet Content and Application Service Providers",
> Brian Carpenter, Sheng Jiang, 10-Jul-12
>
> Please read it now. We are interested in, among other things,
> technical commentary on the draft and the working group's perception
> on its usefulness to its target audience.

Support.

One comment, regarding section 5.2: «It is worth noting that whereas
OSPF and RIP differ significantly between IPv4 and IPv6, IS-IS has the
advantage of handling them both in a single instance of the protocol».

I am under the impression that OSPFv3 also has this advantage (cf. RFC
5838: «Support of Address Families in OSPFv3»). I haven't yet played
with this functionality myself, though.

Best regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email