IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)

"Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E16F21F8510 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjKPONM7b435 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F3921F850D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 01:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=gvandeve@cisco.com; l=2802; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344327870; x=1345537470; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=UsE5GfPsGITBiCrvRHEQkEPBIxm2ZTXNP/KqXKRwCNA=; b=PUpH347YgMgrHVVYURCmwlfAVqwmXnd6GyMtpVU7OFwDl5RY3+otPNVt QC45TWg2FD4YrDqRN+4sufckrgtLqkIMbcXwv0Ic+xY5DDk70F30c16IG Cx33Ce2s2n8EZb2CWtYuMS9k5OLVl0xy2hgfUHUj/uCUAPliz5xX5tFkO k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,725,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="109090407"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2012 08:24:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q778OTnp024583 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:24:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com ([169.254.7.122]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:24:29 -0500
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
Thread-Index: AQHNc9/hDzwzSeK+NE2Vr68ZU+v1+JdNXcOAgACQYQCAABYfgA==
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:24:28 +0000
Message-ID: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B2406AC0F@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
References: <20120806142829.81256B1E003@rfc-editor.org> <F457181A-090E-4417-A4AD-3ADB7BE35BCE@cisco.com> <502077C6.2080609@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <502077C6.2080609@bogus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.83.96]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19090.004
x-tm-as-result: No--43.736400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:53:28 -0700
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com" <livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com>, Olaf Bonness <Olaf.Bonness@t-systems.com>, "cpopovic@cisco.com" <cpopovic@cisco.com>, "gunter@cisco.com" <gunter@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:24:31 -0000

Yes, agree.
Anything the authors need to do on this?

G/

-----Original Message-----
From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com] 
Sent: 07 August 2012 04:05
To: Fred Baker (fred)
Cc: gunter@cisco.com; cpopovic@cisco.com; Tim Chown; Olaf Bonness; HahnC@t-systems.com; Benoit Claise (bclaise); livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com; v6ops v6ops WG; Ron Bonica
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5375 (3309)

On 8/6/12 10:28 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> My perception: we should accept the erratum. Agree?
so my interpretation.

  3627 was moved to historic by 6547. 6164 allows the use of /127s...

5375 maybe wrong now but the reference to 3021 is temporally correct.

so yeah I guess.

  On Aug 6, 2012, at 7:28 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5375,
>> "IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5375&eid=3309
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Lívio Zanol Pereira de Souza Puppim 
>> <livio.zanol.puppim@gmail.com>
>>
>> Section: B.2.2
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> B.2.2. /127 Addresses
>>
>>
>>
>>    The usage of the /127 addresses, the equivalent of IPv4's RFC 3021
>>
>>    [RFC3021], is not valid and should be strongly discouraged as
>>
>>    documented in RFC 3627 [RFC3627].
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> B.2.2. /127 Addresses
>>
>>
>>
>>    The usage of the /127 addresses, the equivalent of IPv4's RFC 3021
>>
>>    [RFC3021], is valid as stated in RFC 6164 [RFC 6164].
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Maybe just remove the section B.2.2?
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please 
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. 
>> When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to 
>> change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5375 (draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon-10)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : IPv6 Unicast Address Assignment Considerations
>> Publication Date    : December 2008
>> Author(s)           : G. Van de Velde, C. Popoviciu, T. Chown, O. Bonness, C. Hahn
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : IPv6 Operations
>> Area                : Operations and Management
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> ----------------------------------------------------
> The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially.
>     - Marshall McLuhan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email