IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDD221F85C4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuBsAEWWfdFE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651A021F8463 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 02:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eekb45 with SMTP id b45so1032937eek.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JttN3vQqngwo16sXrS+jFT/mrtwPCrviz4GzHf9avec=; b=LYk6Ol16aXAAwDMxRhAsnLpLlCU5nMGG+iIgMrAOJqfTsWOrAOF6nS7KVyp7g1vQse Mizz5JEgHpUcSsCaMz/G1t4rr/7lEab6Yt80I4DD4U5SwXDst3M5POZ2yeAo2aIYfD7p eWsfwvJpjET2gAxy/9etn4xQtHxvsuY3EjfT9ZHw+eWDpIzdrnzjVSLNOwmIH/NCJ9G6 IPsCo1nhaoG+FZF5gnUhGhdb9IGS8AYfuRbVmh+sJSKKRWtYJV6f4yPZz6LLiycmM1Ai uweIhaLCKvekQJC6Jybpanmx7tpSLCHUQq00E2BlS3X3P+Jj8+IFNZtdSsBne1a/3stW Wdxg==
Received: by 10.14.207.9 with SMTP id m9mr16755391eeo.5.1344331035512; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.232.110.167] (c167.al.cl.cam.ac.uk. [128.232.110.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e7sm18254717eep.2.2012.08.07.02.17.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5020DD1B.3010702@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:15 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
References: <CC45BCBA.1DC06%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC45BCBA.1DC06%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:17:17 -0000

On 06/08/2012 23:51, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
> Brian/Sheng,
> 
> Overall, this came out quite good.  Did a full read over, and only had one
> comment/suggestions.
> 
> In section 5.3 [DNS] , you made good note of some devices such as XP which
> may only use IPv4 connectivity for DNS with query capability for A and
> AAAA.
> 
> Would it be advisable to also add the reverse case were an IPv6-only
> addressed (or DNSv6 address supplied) host can make queries for A records?
> (perhaps this detail is not important and the existing point gets the
> thought across).

Isn't that case going to be tied intimately to techniques such as DNS64,
because the A record is of no immediate use to an IPv6-only node?

A dual stack node provisioned only with a v6-accessible DNS server is
certainly a theoretical possibility, but is it likely?

I agree we could mention the point.

Thanks

     Brian
> 
> Other then that trivial item, looks good.
> 
> Support 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Victor K
> 
> 
> 
> On 12-08-06 1:29 AM, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> perception
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email