IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Answers to the on-site questions for draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt

"Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <liushucheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D6721F8644 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.687, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LReHTlRsslJl for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D302021F858F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AIO87153; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:36:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:33:04 -0700
Received: from SZXEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.91) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:33:07 -0700
Received: from SZXEML546-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.75]) by szxeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.91]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:33:01 +0800
From: "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com>
To: "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com>, "wesley.george@twcable.com" <wesley.george@twcable.com>, "lorenzo@google.com" <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: Answers to the on-site questions for draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNdGZ9wrnDDKCo4U6J8Agv5K/xKA==
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:33:01 +0000
Message-ID: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB2B94C409@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <OFD22200D9.689DC01C-ON48257A45.00299C89-48257A45.002A9310@zte.com.cn> <CAPu_Ac4Crr7y_WUxS7iZ9yTTg=tTEvaxsjXYXdR0qTZqDn5LgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPu_Ac4Crr7y_WUxS7iZ9yTTg=tTEvaxsjXYXdR0qTZqDn5LgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.79.130]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, 陈仲华 <18918588897@189.cn>
Subject: [v6ops] Answers to the on-site questions for draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 06:36:03 -0000

Hi,

I am sending the answers to those questions I didn't answered during my presentation of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt. Please see below.

[17:29:04] <joel jaeggli> fred - question - internet architecturel has a defined internetworking function - which you didn't use.
A: Fred, I am really sorry I am not sure which internetworking function you were refering to. Could you please reply with the specific one? Thanks.

[17:29:43] <joel jaeggli> wes george - where did you find a slam that does atm but speaks ipv6
A: I said "the scenario here is come from from china telecom" at the meeting.

[17:31:26] <joel jaeggli> lorenzo - a large number of these devices are doing ipoe which doesn't support v6. I think you might be willing to replace the bng and do you want.
A: IWF on BNG is a alternative solution, which we might think about to add into our draft. However, the scenario here is like this, "CPE--(1)--AN--(2)--BNG". Network (2) is ethernet based ipv6 network in current deployment. That's why we are suggesting to do this on AN. 

Regards,
Will

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email