Re: [v6ops] "RE: goals of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt "

Jiexin Zhang <estrellazhang2012@gmail.com> Wed, 25 July 2012 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <estrellazhang2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B6221F84D0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-K8hUVngZK1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E6C21F84CF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so142854wey.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ALBkVD914jafBygwJ4vjmgriVCTTbQRSBu1QdzSd1Y0=; b=SO+A6UidHe2c09SfCsNW518YkNDUPs3mVGQmLHqkLVeh1kcsYaEULdCw1NqHENda/7 Dp9Iq52GjK+9QEDTY9hkpkmBi8ud7tzDOVZoml91W7GMuyEj86Ceb6CtC8/4FI8tdON5 U5qC5UuT9ZZWY1IP4ZOfc46UX8rZFmA5KbRozbu5TiwxF78xAJ1ZKVRxss3jddpORDz1 7KwSzdE4Jly92aEXl5G2ouhgiBrdwyG34yoNs0yPGk7YPgAK58hrxVC12kgoj87M1GIV 22iYzmjN2UCYtjHWu6uOwz+H5ihIqgSGfe2bYrLMx3pV9rZ0V0hPwkrz3683S26toD5M 7cnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.75.168 with SMTP id d8mr11362902wiw.8.1343180440106; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.2.5 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPu_Ac4Crr7y_WUxS7iZ9yTTg=tTEvaxsjXYXdR0qTZqDn5LgQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <OFD22200D9.689DC01C-ON48257A45.00299C89-48257A45.002A9310@zte.com.cn> <CAPu_Ac4Crr7y_WUxS7iZ9yTTg=tTEvaxsjXYXdR0qTZqDn5LgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:40:40 +0800
Message-ID: <CAPu_Ac5pB=Z03x+2RN2GAN7k+pFJBT6C9YF78g7iKs3AQ4WUNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jiexin Zhang <estrellazhang2012@gmail.com>
To: wang.cui1@zte.com.cn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] "RE: goals of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt "
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:40:41 -0000

2012/7/25, Jiexin Zhang <estrellazhang2012@gmail.com>:
> Thanks for the comments from Miss Wang.  Actually,I think IWF means it
can perform both layer2 and IP function. Therefore, IWF can be
performed in a layer 2 node, such as an ATM switch, which works like
the IPv4oA IWF in ATM switch usually.  And it can also be performed
in a layer 3 node, BRAS as an example. In this draft, we just defined
IWF is in a layer 2 node.
>
~~JX
>
> 2012/7/24, wang.cui1@zte.com.cn <wang.cui1@zte.com.cn>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have throughly read this draft and the discussions on the mailing list,
>> the previous questions from fred and J.S help my understanding about this
>> draft,
>> and this solution seems more economical which just need updates the
>> version of
>> the ATM nodes than buying extra equipments to replace the located ATM
>> nodes or ATM network;
>>
>> But here I have a comment:
>>
>>     1) You said the "Interworking Function" is a layer 2 node, but in
>> section 4.2,what the IPv6oA IWF do seems like a
>>         layer 3 node because this node has to deal with IP address. What
>> do you think ?
>>
>> Thanks~
>> Cui Wang
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------
>> ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail
>> (and
>> any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and
>> is
>> intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  If you are not an
>> intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other
>> dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited.
>> If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>