[v6ops] "RE: goals of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt "

wang.cui1@zte.com.cn Tue, 24 July 2012 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wang.cui1@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC6A21F8601 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yfdxNyXqZNnL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4400F21F85E6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 10723102519342; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:36:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 60404.1353729570; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:46:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q6O7kHws080607; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:46:17 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wang.cui1@zte.com.cn)
To: estrellazhang2012@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: D22200D9:689DC01C-48257A45:00299C89; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFD22200D9.689DC01C-ON48257A45.00299C89-48257A45.002A9310@zte.com.cn>
From: wang.cui1@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:46:16 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2012-07-24 15:46:16, Serialize complete at 2012-07-24 15:46:16
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002A930E48257A45_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q6O7kHws080607
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] "RE: goals of draft-zhang-v6ops-ipv6oa-iwf-00.txt "
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:46:27 -0000

Hi,

I have throughly read this draft and the discussions on the mailing list,
the previous questions from fred and J.S help my understanding about this 
draft, 
and this solution seems more economical which just need updates the 
version of 
the ATM nodes than buying extra equipments to replace the located ATM 
nodes or ATM network; 

But here I have a comment: 

    1) You said the "Interworking Function" is a layer 2 node, but in 
section 4.2,what the IPv6oA IWF do seems like a 
        layer 3 node because this node has to deal with IP address. What 
do you think ? 

Thanks~
Cui Wang


--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.