Re: [v6ops] Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-06: (with COMMENT)

[Lorenzo Colitti <[e-mail]>]

Alissa,

thanks for the comments. We've made changes in -07 to address them.

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Section 3: s/which is only available in 3GPP release 10/which has been
> made available as of 3GPP release 10/
>

Changed to "3GPP release 10 or above".


> Section 9.1:
> - May be better not to presume that operators do things "to avoid
> liability" - I don't think that particular sentence is necessary here.
>

Er, oops. Changed to "attribute liability", which is what we meant.

- I was surprised not to see a note here about interaction between this
> kind of host tracking and MAC address randomization, which I assume makes
> tracking harder independently of the whether the recommendations in this
> document are followed. But is it not discussed because operators who feel
> they need these kind of logs also prohibit MAC randomization?
>

Agreed. Added a mention of MAC address randomization just after "ongoing
efforts to improve the privacy of DHCPv6 (RFC7844)". That's the most
obvious place, since MAC address randomization is discussed in depth in RFC
7844.

Cheers,
Lorenzo