IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Fri, 24 February 2012 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F2D21F8802 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:00:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kygs7gHEPOyo for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD7A21F8812 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Env-Sender: bs7652@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1330102852!65189805!1
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.146]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.5.5; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 11134 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2012 17:00:52 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp7.sbc.com (HELO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.146) by server-11.tower-120.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Feb 2012 17:00:52 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1OGxIGt006825; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:59:19 -0500
Received: from sflint04.pst.cso.att.com (sflint04.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.231]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1OGxGqC006724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:59:16 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUB9D.ITServices.sbc.com (gaalpa1msghub9d.itservices.sbc.com [130.8.36.90]) by sflint04.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:00:27 -0500
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.6.249]) by GAALPA1MSGHUB9D.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.36.90]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:00:27 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: Teemu Savolainen <tsavo.stds@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis
Thread-Index: AQHM7VAtWpQV+h/2P02U0L/tglKVnJZMTkEQ
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:00:27 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611043C0B@GAALPA1MSGUSR9N.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <CABmgDzR5dGLQyNC3mu_4y=RjOVRpqiGeqrTXRTcpNvkFtzEtow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABmgDzR5dGLQyNC3mu_4y=RjOVRpqiGeqrTXRTcpNvkFtzEtow@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-puzzleid: {A1013820-7B7B-4E3A-8BAA-0D3A55EB71EF}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AFPl EUmx F2ES F67Z GOrl HDZe MBKi MSgZ Mgq4 MyB5 NZwh OwQ8 RoCx TqkM UBX7 XaN9; 2; dABzAGEAdgBvAC4AcwB0AGQAcwBAAGcAbQBhAGkAbAAuAGMAbwBtADsAdgA2AG8AcABzAEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {A1013820-7B7B-4E3A-8BAA-0D3A55EB71EF}; YgBzADcANgA1ADIAQABhAHQAdAAuAGMAbwBtAA==; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:00:21 GMT; UgBFADoAIABbAHYANgBvAHAAcwBdACAAUABEAC0AZQB4AGMAbAB1AGQAZQAgAHcAYQBzACAAYQBwAHAAcgBvAHYAZQBkACAAYgB5ACAAdABoAGUAIABJAEUAUwBHACAALQA+ACAAcwBoAG8AdQBsAGQAIABiAGUAIABpAG4AYwBsAHUAZABlAGQACQBpAG4AdABvACAANgAyADAANABiAGkAcwA=
x-originating-ip: [135.70.114.248]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611043C0BGAALPA1MSGUSR9NIT_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
Subject: Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:00:56 -0000

I have a question as to whether this needs to be a MUST/SHALL or can it be a SHOULD.
In my mind, the answer to this depends on how operators who intend to use PD-exclude will treat CE routers that do not support PD-exclude.
Will they refuse to offer IA_PD (so the non-PD-exclude-supporting CE router is useless for attachment to that access network), or will they offer IA_PD and either also offer IA_NA (from a different prefix) or let the CE router operate in "unnumbered mode"?
If there are numerous operators who intend to use PD-exclude and won't support non-PD-exclude CE routers, then I agree it's a MUST/SHALL. If these networks will also provide support for non-PD-exclude CE routers, then I think SHOULD would be reasonable.
Barbara

From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Teemu Savolainen
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:43 AM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis

Hi v6ops,

You may have already noticed that draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude-04 was yesterday approved by the IESG.

I would like to add to the draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis section 4.2 a new requirement (to W-4, or maybe to the WPD-x series) that says support for pd-exclude is a SHALL for IPv6 CE router.

Best regards,

Teemu


FYI: ---

State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.

ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-pd-exclude/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email