IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPR Disclosure Apple Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 13 October 2017 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704D0133054; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bNNFUVU1FGRL; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83A4C133044; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: ietf-ipr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v9D6fAYm075437 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:41:10 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <59E06E29.2020504@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:41:29 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.19 (Macintosh/20170908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis@ietf.org, IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
References: <150729961282.13153.11665710240253893831@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAedzxpqgGLSn7BZnFRS7B-efk2krvD9HtA6hBppuJHsj5sD5A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxpqgGLSn7BZnFRS7B-efk2krvD9HtA6hBppuJHsj5sD5A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kexS4Q0kTghJsnc1Nz1HUDPsBgc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPR Disclosure Apple Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc6555bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:41:41 -0000

Erik Kline wrote:
> I see this was submitted on "October 5, 2017".  I suppose now is the
> chance for the working group to evaluate what this means and perhaps
> reconsider this document's status?

does the ietf have a position on ipr licensing terms with retaliatory
clauses?  If so, this is less of a wg issue and more of an ietf issue.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email