Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-02.txt

[Mikael Abrahamsson <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:

> Mikael,
>
> The top portion of the text (in section 2.1.1) describes the concept of using 
> two links or two Vlans to separate traffic.

Well, from end system point of view, it's a single vlan, it doesn't need 
to understand the two vlans. So this is somewhat of in-between.

> The option of separating IPv4 and IPv6 on links (logical or physical) is set 
> as option (b).  We have a brief discussion on the last paragraph on some 
> reasons to choose this.  Now before we action any changes, there is 
> discussion in the last paragraph which talks about limitations on network 
> equipment and device-specific limitations.
>
> If you don't feel that this text is sufficient, then which of the following 
> approaches do you think would best get the point across.
>
> (1).  Have a new paragraph(s) which highlight option (b) more and then 
> provide a listing of pros/cons (where the pros can then point to items you 
> wanted addressed)

I think this is the approach I would prefer. Try to give examples how it 
can be done and pros and cons so the implementor can make an informed 
choice.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: [e-mail]