IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world: clarification text

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 20 April 2015 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508611B2F12 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pbdy2mTa9HeH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webspace.isi.edu (webspace.isi.edu [128.9.64.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D99F1B2F0E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-71-103-148-202.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.103.148.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3KFdtwC023733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55351DCB.7080706@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:39:55 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <552CD2CE.3070801@si6networks.com> <D1567F3B.43843%evyncke@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1567F3B.43843%evyncke@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lbar8pid9br3k4gtS8Nj9M3s8aY>
Cc: "draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world: clarification text
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:40:29 -0000


On 4/17/2015 12:17 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
...
> Should we say something around the lines of "... Undesirable except when
> Those packets cannot be forwarded without impacting the performance and
> the health of the network devices" ?

<sarcasm>

Absolutely - it's entirely unreasonable to expect vendors to support the
protocols they claim, when to do so would impact their profits.

</sarcasm>

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email