Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt

Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it> Thu, 01 December 2011 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D63421F8B39 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:19:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.417, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IwcBRtyuEn3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg702ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A8E21F8B36 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from GRFHUB702BA020.griffon.local (10.188.101.112) by GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:19:54 +0100
Received: from GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.16]) by GRFHUB702BA020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.112]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 02:19:54 +0100
From: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:16:25 +0100
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcyvvqtFe71xQAubQBOgc8pspmJjdQACC1Jq
Message-ID: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EBC900F8E@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
References: <CAF26956.183598%wbeebee@cisco.com> <DE98E6AF-ACCF-430F-A97C-B36EF89DBB88@gmail.com> <DDBA2068-F8B6-460E-BE50-8399D03831A5@employees.org> <2963F168-45CB-4042-8238-56DF538B0543@gmail.com> <EDCECAAA-E83D-4F4F-8B3F-155E524FA6E6@employees.org> <E4D75382-2EB7-4B43-956D-31A7D4A152F5@gmail.com> <2E33369F-19B7-4437-B4C1-A58762DF8F9B@employees.org> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC5E99475F3@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3035EF30B@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC5E994777C@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <8AF88A07-C1C5-4CD9-9E87-9D0F26504641@employees.org> <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC5E99477F1@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz> <D6395FF4-5875-4127-80D7-D9ECE468D023@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr165Q7tz7-haWNFdcvJ4OX6wCUMNJnK5nfbUDrc3xEMWA@mail.gmail.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EBC900F88@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <CAKD1Yr03ZFyav=DuYvjN2sAWLa04WAxbFp3K-O-8xmk1t3Z1SA@mail.gmail.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EBC900F89@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <CAC8QAccV+HJtLFKP+2B_Lqs6ZKi=Y04uLxW-wAZ67HqkP9EOww@mail.gmail.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EBC900F8D@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>, <CAC8QAcdtpBt0e2dmNm8Q9tcCAZdMf5yiwFohi2phtVKwQhhPzw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcdtpBt0e2dmNm8Q9tcCAZdMf5yiwFohi2phtVKwQhhPzw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, it-IT
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, it-IT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 01:19:57 -0000

Yes you can install the aggregate route but you would need either another dhc option that tells the BNG what aggregate route needs to be installed per each customer or you have to do by manual configuration.
In my opinion using PD-exclude is operational much simpler

Roberta
________________________________________
From: Behcet Sarikaya [sarikaya2012@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 1:17 AM
To: Maglione Roberta
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt

Roberta,

I don't see that a problem either because usually you can install an aggregate route.

Regards,

Behcet

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>> wrote:
Behcet,
  the reason why you may need to have a single prefix instead of two per customer is in order to have just a single route to install on the BNG instead of two.

Regards
Roberta
________________________________________
From: Behcet Sarikaya [sarikaya2012@gmail.com<mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:22 AM
To: Maglione Roberta
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti; v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt

Hi Roberta,

You don't need to restrict yourself to the use of a single prefix in IPv6. Usually DR can allocate many prefixes to the RR.

Besides these prefixes are used for some time and then not needed any more. I don't see any reason to be so frugal.

Regards,

Behcet

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it><mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>>> wrote:
> If you're not using the /64 to number the link between the BNG and the CE, then you can make the link unnumbered and you don't need to exclude
> anything.

You could make the link unnumbered, but the WAN link could also be numbered.
If you refer to BBF TR-187, TR-177, TR-124i2  you can see that both unnumbered and numbered  are considered valid scenarios.
PD-exclude is need in order to build the WAN numbered scenario with a single  prefix.

Roberta

________________________________________
From: Lorenzo Colitti [lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com><mailto:lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>>]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:24 PM
To: Maglione Roberta
Cc: jouni korhonen; v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org><mailto:v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis-03.txt

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 04:12, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it><mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>><mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it><mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it<mailto:roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>>>> wrote:
PD-exclude allows to delegate a single prefix to the home network and than use the PD-exclude option to tell the CPE to exclude a portion of the delegated prefix and use it to number the point to point WAN link between the requesting router (CPE) and the delegated router (BNG)

I still don't see why this is needed.

If you're using the /64 to number the link between the BNG and the CE router, then the CE router already knows that the /64 is assigned to that link via the O bit in the prefix information option in the RA.

If you're not using the /64 to number the link between the BNG and the CE, then you can make the link unnumbered and you don't need to exclude anything.

So...?

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org><mailto:v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops


Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.



Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.