IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-06: (with COMMENT)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4180B12D093 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAd3pS1OzQ11 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F3712D583 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h19so66075107ywc.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wr5QyKvOYV7Z29lxsjt281dDrlQJ0TkCOLoQG5BN2rI=; b=hFJXRiKsZW8RyxN12Cna1mF5eN6MuCemL4Ftd5xNWNxQQYRt1Jm8NYWMGi3pXRwqMh 5TYi7++ocSBFw7nxAkSawGpfFoPv28cSCltIQ84ySxGbLIK3GUqhQypgXvt1dBBhTX4M 9mqdYFapeomfLYiCwUXuJ35G5+r7/k6CUflANPuo739UNM8P1YPgQWKYLjL50pf6EJ7i 4/PKh+DjcdEUdgkgXqpKvCDhCO8bjDL8nz6iR9JoTuoaISc2aaVl1td6ef+IdJHLX86U liCLoACgGG5HMeQavqxQCutus20Kt3vqoumj+xUyYAS1Dim1OaaQyRypGwX3KakBpr7b 3pTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wr5QyKvOYV7Z29lxsjt281dDrlQJ0TkCOLoQG5BN2rI=; b=dzJBBWAmITPuNsXtgeoOzUjfR2gevjWV6+hEQAzVDfZvUZjxzK2a5neTUt761f0IBO fuRNn9qTKG0yvRwD1gfx49CRn8zLL+CVzqK6zuST5337cSLFPDcOhMSraCb8aFcIOMF/ tdCpviQ5H0A9N1GJ7KNIM/KWyGlj6a5CINLQj3+rDc113Y5lgO2ywoa7QoScK3XH/5ND weHKHUvSai6SJMoaLNa7wcjlAIn3BBEwmHFsL2WwX6luGPOtgJUdMdl2o0tqOaDrlrlI ze5oQr1NxCsQXm4LO9uRZnAAd4ezjfDZFrCYp+3Qc/BWr4j6qbj3CwT+ZCw5A6Nn6G+2 AssQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIxVt5SmQxzUPLpakyOyyKP9dCtTL58s25pGwNwc7b+o0g0uO8csZ8fujo8k85AmKWQjVAe5Wk6yP7q0Jj6
X-Received: by 10.37.193.4 with SMTP id r4mr4195476ybf.185.1464235521872; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.198.68 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2016 21:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160503222244.8246.28466.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160503222244.8246.28466.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:05:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3=PcqbygBk1ptgbisBUj6cKRmeJqTOz6wC+0V_HGV=gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05529c269dc10533b6e60f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/n0vKNvIcbu3VRG0FwkZUuZveGr8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, fred.baker@cisco.com, draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 04:05:32 -0000

Ben,

we've addressed the comments in -07.

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Section 7: I _think_ the point of this section is to suggest that we
> cannot reasonably estimate an upper limit. But if it says that
> explicitly, I missed it. (I fear a careless reader will walk away
> thinking "20" is a good limit)
>

We've attempted to to address this by adding the following sentence at the
end of the section:

   Thus, in general is is not possible to estimate in advance
   how many addresses are required.

Better?

Section 8: s/RECOMMENDED to not impose a hard limit/NOT RECOMMENDED to
> impose a hard limit/
>

Updated.

Regards,
Lorenzo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email