Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS (464XLAT, DS-Lite, lw4o6, MAP-E, MAP-T)

Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net> Tue, 18 September 2018 15:58 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <940CC666-9208-4784-B452-58D5482B7782@consulintel.es> <d8960bbf-ba84-e7e1-6d2b-63f973a7f33c@hit.bme.hu> <C40B15B6-4AB9-433F-94AD-A2624F359DC4@gmail.com> <6b691c03-a2ee-3656-e1bc-edbb17583216@hit.bme.hu> <1BFAD96D-F06E-4EBF-8751-761EF08E6EE0@consulintel.es> <67b5991a-e7ac-aef2-eeae-7531598428fe@asgard.org> <211c5c27-11a3-b264-3b5a-9d8f10f6ec45@hit.bme.hu> <CAHL_VyBcni90oJJTPVux5hcF+=ZUxvqs0-i=4XhvgE-KkSFU2g@mail.gmail.com> <1fd5d319-579d-ceed-c820-d43695e53a44@hit.bme.hu> <91A290C6-E187-439C-8916-E4720244A5A7@isc.org> <4ac93c8d-0919-6676-beed-8d31aacdc467@asgard.org>
In-Reply-To: <4ac93c8d-0919-6676-beed-8d31aacdc467@asgard.org>
From: Edwin Cordeiro <edwin@scordeiro.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:58:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAERpkxBmQOH10W2c-SumYbS84UKQapo50bKVeunpJBOBm3ci1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d500480576275da1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/niHBV3ymBfWHFGqKhMPP4MnsYEE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS (464XLAT, DS-Lite, lw4o6, MAP-E, MAP-T)
Precedence: list

I did an analysis on some of the techniques a few years ago, not sure if it
would still be useful:
http://edwin.scordeiro.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ComparisonBetweenIPv4toIPv6TransitionTechniques.pdf

In the unlikely case you speak Portuguese all the details are available at:
http://edwin.scordeiro.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Edwin_Cordeiro_Mestrado_IPT.pdf

Edwin Cordeiro


On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:23 PM Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 09/17/2018 08:33 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Requires using ISP’s recursive servers
> >
> > Yes, No, No, No, No
> >
> > We don’t yet have a NAT64 prefix discovery mechanism for 464XLAT that
> > doesn’t use the DNS.  This is not the same as requiring DNS64.  The
> > mapping can be in a locally served IPV4ONLY.ARPA zone (note this has
> > all the same DNSSEC issues as DNS64 because IANA’s IPV4ONLY.ARPA zone
> > is signed and securely delegated).
> >
> As I think about it, Google has public DNS64 servers that return a
> synthesized address using the WKP 64:ff9b::/96. So you might not be
> required to use the ISP's DNS (if the ISP uses the WKP).
> Or, as you say, other DNS shenanigans.
>
> Lee
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

Re: [v6ops] "BoF" for I-D -- Re: Pros and Cons of… Alejandro D'Egidio
Re: [v6ops] "BoF" for I-D -- Re: Pros and Cons of… Richard Patterson
Re: [v6ops] "BoF" for I-D -- Re: Pros and Cons of… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
[v6ops] "BoF" for I-D -- Re: Pros and Cons of IPv… Lencse Gábor
Re: [v6ops] Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Tech… Lee Howard
Re: [v6ops] Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Tech… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
[v6ops] Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technolo… Lencse Gábor
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… Owen DeLong
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… Fred Baker
Re: [v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ie… Lencse Gábor
[v6ops] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ietf-v… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
[v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and Cons… Lencse Gábor
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Ole Troan
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Lee Howard
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Mark Andrews
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Ole Troan
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Lee Howard
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Lee Howard
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Edwin Cordeiro
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Simon Hobson
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Fred Baker
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Fred Baker
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Mark Andrews
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Alexandre Petrescu
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Lee Howard
Re: [v6ops] Request for your two cents: Pros and … Lee Howard